adopting alternative OSes (was Re: [Am-info] New E-mail Worm Exploits SARS Anxiety)
mike
mikestp@telus.net
Fri, 25 Apr 2003 14:01:03 -0700
----- Original message ---------------------------------------->
From: Roy Bixler <rcb@bix.org>
To: <am-info@venice.essential.org>
Received: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:46:12 -0500
Subject: adopting alternative OSes (was Re: [Am-info] New E-mail=
Worm Exploits SARS Anxiety)
>On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 01:12:11PM -0700, mike wrote:
>> Because Linux is not yet ready for the desktop. I have a new=
ASUS
>> mainboard here and when Redhat Shrike is installed it cannot=
find
>> the network card (built in) . After I looked at what had to=
be done
>> to simply install a network driver, again I understood why=
Linux is
>> still outa the ball park when compared to Windows. At least=
as far
>> as the average user is concerned. I feel Linux is at least=
three
>> generations behind Windows when being considered as a desktop=
client
>> for the masses.
>It's true that sometimes the hardware detection isn't good but,
>typically, "the masses" don't buy their own motherboards and do=
any OS
>installation whatsoever. It would help tremendously if the=
hardware
>manufacturers and OEMs would either write Linux drivers or at=
least
>support open source coders that write drivers by giving them
>specifications for their devices. It would also be helpful if=
the
>Dells of the world would really support Linux by pre-installing=
it on
>their machines. The fact that they don't is somewhat, if not=
mostly,
>due to contracts with Microsoft. But when the major PC vendors
>pre-install Linux on their hardware, that's when it can be=
considered
>"for the masses." As it is, it looks like it will be a slow=
grind as
>the market continues to evolve.
It wasn't that the drivers were not available, but the hassle of=
installing a driver. none of the people I support would be able=
to install the network driver. Asus was kind enough to put a=
driver on the cdrom sent with the mainboard. but the=
instructions would be beyond 95% of the windows users. this is=
what is still poor with regard to Linux. The installations are=
not well thought out, and each distribution has a different=
method.
>Meanwhile, if you still want to try Linux, I suggest Knoppix at
>"http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html". It's a big=
download
>at 700 MB, but the hardware detection is definitely a cut above=
your
>average distribution.
I am able to install most Linux on any of my machines, but rather=
my complaints were about Linux and the average user. I see=
Linux now in exactly the same boat as Warp was in 10 years ago. =
IBM also overestimated the ability of the average user....
>> Unless your company has dedicated IT people willing
>> and ale to support Linux desktops, it currently has a=
snowballs
>> chance in hell to replace Windows for the average user.
>I hear that's happening in more and more companies due to=
Microsoft's
>strong-arm licence policies and higher licence fees.
Those companies that have dedicated IT staff, and those staff are=
trained somewhere other than a Microsoft MCSC shop, are looking=
at Linux at the server level. But few if any are actually=
rolling out major Linux desktops....
>> Sad but true. I hope they can get it together, but so far it=
is
>> still a long way off....
>It's largely a cultural problem and not a technological one. =
When a
>critical mass decides that Microsoft takes too many liberties,=
then
>you will find Linux/name-your-alternative-OS support easier to=
come
>by. Meanwhile, running an alternative OS will likely take a bit=
more
>diligence, such as researching which hardware best supports your=
OS,
>on your part.
It is a software user interface engineering problem. No one is=
steering the ship. No one has the right way to do things, so=
most distributions are all doing a different wrong thing.... =
Maybe the unified Linux movement might have a chance....
>R.
>_______________________________________________
>Am-info mailing list
>Am-info@lists.essential.org
>http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/am-info