[Am-info] Sun Lawyer Faces Grilling At Java Appeal

[T. Guilbert]

In a message dated 2003 April 10 (Thursday), timestamp 10:25 AM, 
   on the topic [Am-info] Sun Lawyer Faces Grilling At Java Appeal,
   "Fred A. Miller" <fm@cupserv.org> wrote:

"|One witness described Sun's portion of the hearing in the antitrust
"|case as more of a conversation between one of the judges and a Sun
"|lawyer than a full legal presentation.

"|Microsoft lawyer David Tulchin received only a handful of questions
"|from  the judges, according to Microsoft and Sun officials present
"|at the  hearing.

"|http://computerworld.com/newsletter/0,4902,80005,00.html?nlid=APP

A very rough rule of thumb at oral argument before appellate panels is
that the lawyer whose side will prevail gets the more questions.  The
aim is to test the vulnerability of the opinion the court is preparing
to write. 

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
/*\   T. Guilbert
\ /   "Ethical at One of One dot Net"  
 X    Portland, Oregon, United States of America  
/ \     [ASCII Ribbon Campaign against HTML postings] 
-----------------------------------------------------------