[Am-info] Microsoft ordered to carry Java

[Erick Andrews]

On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 09:17:43 -0800, Mitch Stone wrote:

>Not sure what you mean -- this is a larger setback then anything 
>they've been handed in the government's antitrust suit. Please explain.
>
>On Monday, December 23, 2002, at 05:14 PM, Erick Andrews wrote:
>
>> I don't know what you folks may think, but I think
>> Microsoft's actions are blatantly illegal here:
>

Sorry, I no longer have the reference/URL, but I recall that when I read
the article I thought MS was doing something illegal.  If MS is found
guilty, it surely *would* be a setback to Microsoft.

Is that what you are saying, that it would be a setback to Microsoft?
If so, we must agree.

-- 
Erick Andrews