[Am-info] Bill Gates show loses its lustre
Roy Bixler
rcb@bix.org
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 18:38:45 -0600
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:03:54AM -0500, John J. Urbaniak wrote:
> And Linux is NOT the answer. Replacing Windows with Linux would
> just transfer the stagnation to a different platform.
Linux is a kernel, not an operating system. There are many different
Linux distributions and many different Linux-based operating systems
serving different markets. Comparing Linux to Windows is
fundamentally an apples to oranges comparison (or, if you wish, a
kiwis to bananas comparison.)
Even if you modified your statement to say (arbitrarily picking a
particular Linux distribution here) "Replacing Windows with Red Hat
Linux would just transfer the stagnation to a different platform", I'm
still not entirely sure I would agree. As long as Red Hat stays open
source, I don't see how they could pull the same market manipulation
tricks that Microsoft pulls.
> Heterogeneity and diversity in Operating Systems and Applications are the answers.
With that, I agree wholeheartedly.
R.