[Am-info] Do you think Kottar-Kelley will delay ruling until a Democrat is president?

[Mitch Stone]

And continues on to the present day.

Both of these hearings were shameful political circuses, especially Thomas'
. If they had it to do over, probably neither side would play it quite the 
same way; then again, I don't see any evidence of contrition on the part 
of either party. Republicans admitted that sandbagging Clinton judicial 
nominations was a legitimate form a pay-back for Bork and Thomas -- so 
back and forth it goes, both parties claiming the judiciary as their 
political spoils, and neither showing any inclination to put the nation's 
welfare above their own.

Mitch

On Monday, October 21, 2002, at 08:05 AM, John J. Urbaniak wrote:

>
> I think the poison began with Bork and continued through Clarence Thomas.