[Am-info] Do you think Kottar-Kelley will delay ruling untila Democrat is president?

[John J. Urbaniak]

Mark Hinds wrote:

>  >  Too bad none of the president's hundred-plus judge nominees have been
>  >approved by the wonderful US Senate.... Might reduce that caseload a bit.
>  >That's something to keep in mind when you go vote, if you do - Senate
>  >control determines if we get open judge positions filled or not. Some on
>  >the list probably prefer to see all those cases bottled up than to see
>  >any Bush judges presiding over them. And some of us probably don't.
>
> Yeah, I remember how it got so back logged - a Republican controlled
> Senate wouldn't let almost any of President Clinton's nominations through
> in 8 years. I'll certainly consider that when I vote, but then niether
> of my Senators is up for re-election this time.
>

Well, somehow this Judge's nomination got through.

John