[Am-info] Do you think Kottar-Kelley will delay ruling until a Democrat is president?

[Mark Hinds]

 >  Too bad none of the president's hundred-plus judge nominees have been
 >approved by the wonderful US Senate.... Might reduce that caseload a bit.
 >That's something to keep in mind when you go vote, if you do - Senate
 >control determines if we get open judge positions filled or not. Some on
 >the list probably prefer to see all those cases bottled up than to see
 >any Bush judges presiding over them. And some of us probably don't.

Yeah, I remember how it got so back logged - a Republican controlled
Senate wouldn't let almost any of President Clinton's nominations through
in 8 years. I'll certainly consider that when I vote, but then niether
of my Senators is up for re-election this time.