[Am-info] [Fwd: USA v. Microsoft]

[Erick Andrews]

On Fri, 04 Oct 2002 17:58:49 -0700, T. Guilbert wrote:

>In a message dated 2002 October 04 (Friday), timestamp 07:48 PM, 
>   on the topic Re: [Am-info] [Fwd: USA v. Microsoft],
>   Joe Barr <warthawg@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>"|I wish I knew.  Maybe just a troll to get folks to
>"|register?  
>
>I'm pretty sure it's not that.  I am on PACER because I receive
>electronic notifications of cases in which I am counsel of record. 
>However, many of the notices are nothing more than clerk's entry that
>a paper has been filed.  Unless a document was filed electronically,
>all I get is a line describing the nature of the document.  (Documents
>that the court itself generates are filed electronically.)  However, I
>must pay per page for documents filed in cases in which I am not
>counsel of record. 
>

That's why I'm reluctant to sign up.  Let's see, $0.07 x beaucoup =
some serious change.

You folks that can write it off, the rest of us will greatly appreciate it, 
and please, do keep us informed!  (at least 7-cent's worth?)

-- 
Erick Andrews