[Am-info] Re: So it's official; Windows is insecure

[Glenn Livezey]

> Roy Bixler <rcb@bix.org> wrote:
>Subject: [Am-info] Microsft's Valentine: "Windows not secure by design"
>So it's official; Windows is insecure.  See
>"http://c.moreover.com/click/here.pl?r46677969" for details.  As this
>article at  http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=5313surmises, one wonders
>if there is another shoe (like maybe a Palladium one) to drop shortly.

I have trtied unsuccessfully to load the first reference two times, each time
allowing 10 minutes over a modem line. Please provide the text as a reply
or an attachment. A quote from your second source reads

"News site CW360 first reported this story, but it seems to be overloaded
today, so we'll refer you to the discussion about this at  Slashdot- here-. µ"

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/09/06/1252211&mode=nested&tid=109
Which in turn links you to Info World
http://staging.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/02/09/05/020905hnmssecure.xml?Template=/storypages/printfriendly.html

The salient text seems to be one line by Valentine, and I for one would
appreciate getting that one line in a text (not html) post.

In any case, thank you for any original and related text you can provide.

Sincerely,

Glenn

--
Glenn T. Livezey, Ph.D.

University of Minnesota
Neuroscience Department
Room 6-145 Jackson Hall
321 Church St. S.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55455

(612) 624-2991 FAX 6-5009
glivezey@lenti.med.umn.edu
absent-minded_professor@bigfoot.com