[Am-info] IS WINDOWS OR LINUX EASIER TO INSTALL?

Fred A. Miller fm@cupserv.org
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:37:29 -0400


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

IS WINDOWS OR LINUX EASIER TO INSTALL?

     (Source: LinuxWorld.com) I expected Windows 2000's
installation would be seamless, fast, and lightyears ahead of
upstart Linux's by any measure I could concoct. Yes, it turns out
the Windows 2000 Pro installation is superior to Red Hat Linux
7.3, but in two dubious categories.

http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=3D726332

- --=20
Fred A. Miller
Systems Administrator
Cornell Univ. Press Services
fm@cupserv.org, www.cupserv.org
- --- SuSE Linux v8.0 Pro, KMail 3.0.1---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj1ZJ7kACgkQB9vk4ichYXcGeQCdFYZ0tgCcKRaT56Tu2hR4JFLZ
30MAn00cdEA/vlRFZWP1f1jdEo8wuDg8
=3DOkSb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----