[Am-info] Boston Globe piece this AM
Erick Andrews
Erick Andrews" <eandrews@star.net
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 13:55:05 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 16:09:38 +0100, Jeff Wasel wrote:
>I don't think it's so much a matter of shame as it is one of ignorance and
>sloth. I've seen enough pundit press to conclude that often the "source"
>tends to be as much urban myth as fact. I thought the piece was fairly
>balanced, given that Computer World and Information Week have said roughly
>the same thing. I sent him (the Globe's columnist) a note echoing T.
>Guilbert's observation about nerdiness and usability vs. reliability; I used
>Apache as an example of the Linux model as a pillar of reliability, so let's
>see what he comes back with...
>
>Hope all you folks are doing well-
>
>Jeff
>
If he does, and it's OK, please post it here. Thanks.
I was interviewed by a Boston Globe person (a journalist?
a correspondent? Dunno. A reporter, I guess) 6 years ago about
high tech issues and Microsoft came up. After I was castigated
by the reporter because I felt that MS set the computer industry
back several years with their monopoly and poor quality products,
I've come to realized that the popular press types certainly don't
have a monopoly on critical thinking. I mean this reporter
was animating how wonderful MS was without regard to
any concept of objectivity. I let it sleep.
--
Erick Andrews