[Am-info] Jobs Touts OS, Unveils New IPod
Paul Rickard
pr@ms-bc.com
Sat, 20 Jul 2002 17:15:24 -0400
========== On 2002.07.20 03:36 PM, Mitch Stone typed: ============
>This echoes my suspicions. If Microsoft were a genuine business partner to
>Apple (which of course they are not to Apple or anyone else), they would
>offering some sort of public recognition and support for the difficulty
>and importance of what Apple is attempting to accomplish in the OSX
>transition. At least they would not be criticizing so them like an
>impatient, disapproving parent. Microsoft is never going to admit that the
>real source of their disapproval is, most likely, Apple's current ad
>campaign.
Microsoft is a "partner" in the same way a female grasshopper is the
partner to a mate she's going to devour once he's properly fertilized her.
That Apple ad campaign is a definite sign of things to come. The guy
saying "Windows is just clunky" is Apple firing a shot across Microsoft's
bow. We won't play nice anymore when we don't have to. And Microsoft
dropping all Macintosh development is no longer an "if" but a "when," IMO
anyway. The entire MBU will be laid off or transferred to Microsoft's
Syberian subsidiary. (Expect some of those people to show up inside Apple
sooner or later.) AppleWorks 7 will be a key - that software suite will
be advanced enough to make up for the demise of office:mac whenever that
happens. The fireworks start in about 5 weeks when the August 1997
contract runs out.
By the way, for any Mac users: What do you think about the
possibility of Sherlock 4 being a full-blown Web browser? The thought
occured to me the other day... Apple had one before the Microsoft
agreement and might need one again if IE disappears on the Mac. We shall
see.
======== Paul Rickard, Editor of The Microsoft Boycott Campaign =======
--------------------------------[ Http://www.msboycott.com ]-----------
"But for Microsoft's interference, the market would be much more
dynamic as new technologies and fresh innovations challenged the
company's present dominance."
-Judge Robert Bork, former US Supreme Court nominee