[Am-info] O/S 2 support - slightly off topic (my apologies)
Hans Reiser
reiser@namesys.com
Fri, 15 Mar 2002 23:01:32 +0300
John Poltorak wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 10:16:22PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>>John Poltorak wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 08:45:27PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
>>>
>>>>>What about threads? They were in place from day one - about 15 years ago.
>>>>>
>>>>Threads were not an MS invention.
>>>>
>>>Just to clarify... we are talking about OS/2 rather than Windows aren't
>>>we?...
>>>
>>>OS/2 was the first mainstream OS which included threading in the kernel.
>>>
>>>
>>Andy Tevanian was the inventor, and he added them to Mach while at CMU.
>>
>
>Are you suggesting that Mach is a mainstream OS?
>
Yes. Certainly adequate for the purpose of establishing that any OS to
use threads was imitative.
>
>
>Does anyone ever use it outside academic circles?
>
No.
>
>
>Were there versions of Mach without threads?
>
Before Tevanian got to improving it, yes.
>
>
>OS/2 has had them from the very begining, and the OS is still in
>widespread use throughout the world.
>
It copied Mach. That was wise, not innovative.
>
>
>
>>Hans
>>
>