[Am-info] Re: MS depositions
Erick Andrews
Erick Andrews" <eandrews@star.net
Tue, 26 Feb 2002 19:41:05 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 17:49:51 -0500, John J. Urbaniak wrote:
>
>
>sturde@az.com wrote:
>
>> In <20020226210601.5156A29BAC@lists.essential.org>, on 02/26/02
>> at 04:06 PM, am-info-request@venice.essential.org said:
>>
>> > You'll get nothing useful from them.
>>
>> Au contraire. The judge determines what gets edited out. By the way, the
>> "no-patent violation" clause. Another anti-trust lawsuit looms. And
>> remember MS is a predatory monopoly. It will become part of what
>> Bork/Starr called the "low-hanging" fruit. A treble damage charge against
>> the income statement! It will come.
>
>Yep. Bit by bit Microsoft will be picked to pieces. Then will come the
>employee's suits. Then the stockholder's suits.
>
>John
>
And likely after that, some divorce suits and paternity
suits.
--
Erick Andrews