[Am-info] Re: MS depositions

Erick Andrews Erick Andrews" <eandrews@star.net
Tue, 26 Feb 2002 19:41:05 -0500 (EST)


On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 17:49:51 -0500, John J. Urbaniak wrote:

>
>
>sturde@az.com wrote:
>
>> In <20020226210601.5156A29BAC@lists.essential.org>, on 02/26/02
>>    at 04:06 PM, am-info-request@venice.essential.org said:
>>
>> >  You'll get nothing useful from them.
>>
>> Au contraire.  The judge determines what gets edited out.  By the way, the
>> "no-patent violation" clause.  Another anti-trust lawsuit looms.  And
>> remember MS is a predatory monopoly.  It will become part of what
>> Bork/Starr called the "low-hanging" fruit.  A treble damage charge against
>> the income statement!  It will come.
>
>Yep.  Bit by bit Microsoft will be picked to pieces.  Then will come the
>employee's suits.  Then the stockholder's suits.
>
>John
>

And likely after that, some divorce suits and paternity
suits.

-- 
Erick Andrews