[Am-info] The first 47
John Poltorak
jp@eyup.org
Sat, 16 Feb 2002 13:42:32 +0000
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 08:07:31AM -0500, John J. Urbaniak wrote:
>
>
> Joe Barr wrote:
>
> > Especially the comments by Tunney re full disclosure of contacts
> > with the government.
>
> Indeed. I just can't understand why these judges don't slam MS for
> Contempt of Court: In the Trial, they falsified evidence and submitted
> it; Gates lied and evaded in his testimony; now they blatantly disregard
> the Court's order to disclose all contacts.
The only rational reason that Microsoft gets away with this behaviour is
that there is some major corruption in high places.
What other explanation could there be?
> If I were a Judge, one such incident would bring my gavel down on their
> heads.
The guillotine would be better :-)...
> John
--
John