[Am-info] CNN's view on public comment

[Geoffrey]

I agree with that point, but the issue is, if you don't provide a 
reasonable explanation why you are against the settlement, then you will 
be ignored.  (Microsoft sucks, so don't accept the settlement, just 
doesn't get it)

John Poltorak wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 08:24:43AM -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
> 
>>Hmmm, a substantial difference between zdnet's (paraphased) "7,000 
>>responses that were indifferent" and cnn's 7000 that were taken as 
>>opinions like "I hate Microsoft."
>>
> 
> My reading of the story is that 7,000 'Microsoft haters' is in addition to 
> the 15,000 who were against the settlement so the strength of feeling 
> isn't actually explicitly stated anywhere as three to one against Microsoft...
> 
>  
> 
>>John Poltorak wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/industry/02/07/microsoft.antitrust.ap/index.html
>>>
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Until later: Geoffrey		esoteric@3times25.net

"...the system (Microsoft passport) carries significant risks to users that
are not made adequately clear in the technical documentation available."
- David P. Kormann and Aviel D. Rubin, AT&T Labs - Research
- http://www.avirubin.com/passport.html