Re[2]: [Am-info] 'Big Guns' Weigh In On Microsoft Case
Gene Gaines
Gene Gaines <gene.gaines@gainesgroup.com>
Wed, 30 Jan 2002 04:42:52 -0500
John Poltorak and Mitch Stone,
Well said. (below)
Gene
gene.gaines@gainesgroup.com
On Tuesday, January 29, 2002, 4:50:37 PM, John Poltorak wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 12:57:44PM -0800, Mitch Stone wrote:
>> --- From a message sent by Sujal Shah on 1/28/02 4:30 PM ---
>>
>> >> Excuse me, exactly when was Windows declared "standard?" Like the
>> >> meter, the
>> >> kilogram, the degree fahrenheit, etc ...?
>> >>
>> >
>> >Another response to ACT might be, "That's the point, stupid." The
>> >entire point is to damage (destroy is too strong for an objective
>> >remedy) the Windows standard, precisely because it isn't a "standard,"
>> >but a monopoly maintained through illegal means. The point of the case
>> >is that the "standard" might have crumbled if consumers were allowed to
>> >have a choice in their operating systems and related software.
>>
>> How can anyone in sound mind, and with a straight face, characterize
>> competition as the problem and not the solution? I've been puzzling over
>> this one for years. It's tempting, but too easy, to chalk up these
>> comments as the scripted remarks of paid Microsoft shills. These
>> otherwise intelligent people must somehow have come to believe that
>> competitive markets are not relevant in this instance -- that a
>> proprietary commercial product can be called a "standard" without it also
>> being called a monopoly.
> This is the huge hurdle that we are up against. Most people do see Windows
> as the standard, but fail to grasp that it is a proprietary 'standard'
> controlled and changed at the whim of its owner to not only suppress any
> potential competitor, but to leverage its monopoly position in the desktop
> operating system and applications market, into new markets, viz the
> browser and network OS markets. Both Nescape and Novell were the principal
> players there and where are they now? Increasingly, Microsoft is taking
> over the Internet by foisting its own standards everywhere so that people
> are finding it increasingly difficult to take full advantage of available
> facilities without the use of Internet Explorer.
>> Mitch Stone
>> mitch@accidentalexpert.com
--