[Am-info] Re: Netscape v. MS

sturde@az.com sturde@az.com
Thu, 24 Jan 2002 11:15:51 -0800


In <20020124170103.D08FA29B45@lists.essential.org>, on 01/24/02 
   at 12:01 PM, am-info-request@venice.essential.org said:

>Netscape is reviving government claims, rejected last year by the U.S.
>Court of Appeals, that Microsoft illegally tied its browser to the
>operating system and tried to monopolize the browser market.

Bork and Starr commented that there was no business reason for the tying. 
They did not disagree with the court of appeals opinion in this respect. 
And Bork not only advises Netscape, he knows anti-trust law forwards and
backward.

James Sturdevant


-----------------------------------------------------------
sturde@az.com

-----------------------------------------------------------