[Am-info] "To put it bluntly," Judge Motz wrote

[Sujal Shah]

On Sat, 2002-01-12 at 15:09, Paul Rickard wrote:
> ========== On 2002.01.12 12:39 PM, Mitch Stone typed: ============
> 
> >>"To put it bluntly," Judge Motz wrote, "in the words of the opponents of the
> >>proposed settlement, the donation of free software could be viewed as
> >>constituting `court-approved predatory pricing.' "
> >
> >Finally, somebody gets it.
> 
>     This part was pretty obvious. I wonder how much of the original case 
> she would get, considering that even the government agency that conducted 
> the case no longer seems capable of comprehending the meaning of it all.
> 

Not to be pedantic, but he "would get," not "she would get."  Civil
case, not federal antitrust, in case that was the source of the
confusion.

Sujal


> 
> 
> ======== Paul Rickard, Editor of The Microsoft Boycott Campaign =======
> --------------------------------[ Http://www.msboycott.com ]-----------
> 
>   "We have no intention of shipping another bloated OS and shoving it
>    down the throats of our users."
>        -Paul Maritz, former Microsoft Vice President
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Am-info mailing list
> Am-info@lists.essential.org
> http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/am-info
> 
-- 
------ Sujal Shah ---- sujal@sujal.net

	   http://www.sujal.net/