[Am-info] Re: Nader and Love letter to Judge Motz
Erick Andrews
Erick Andrews" <eandrews@star.net
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 14:21:45 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 19:13:20 +0000, John Poltorak wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 12:23:40PM -0600, Glenn T. Livezey, Ph.D. wrote:
>> >From: James Love <love@cptech.org> Subject: [Am-info] Nader and CPTech
>> >to Judge Motz on MS private antitrust settlement
>> >This is the letter that Ralph Nader and CPTech filed today. Jamie
>> >........... We are writing to ask that you reject the proposed
>> > settlement to the private antitrust actions against Microsoft,
>> > Ralph Nader James Love Consumer Project on Technology
>>
>> Now THIS is the right response from the right source.
>> Thank you Ralph Nader and James Love.
>
>Whilst the sentiment is in the right direction it fall far short in its
>proposals.
>
>
>Microsoft has been found guilty of being an illegal monopoly for God's sake!
>
>In what way has anyone come up with a solution to remedy this situation?
>
>
>What has anyone proposed to prevent the tying of Windows to brand new
>computers?
>
>
>I would suggest that the least that should be done would be to force every
>reseller to offer computers for sale with the option of buying a computer,
>every computer, whether it's from DELL, Compaq, IBM or some company no one
>has ever heard of *without* Windows pre-installed. The price of every
>computer should also clearly state the level of Microsoft Tax being
>charged on the computer in the same way that Sales Tax is shown.
>
>People have got this crazy idea that they get Windows for free because
>they don't even have to ask for it, yet it's there when they power on.
>
>
>The concept of the Microsoft Tax has never really sunk in as far as most
>people are concerned, and they generally don't even understand how the
>monopoly which Microsoft operates, forces prices up and is bad for the
>consumer.
>
>
<snip>
While I whole heartily agree with you, aren't you confusing
this letter to Judge Motz, which is about the education/class
action suit with the DOJ proposed settlement before Judge
Kollar-Kotelley?
--
Erick Andrews