[Am-info] On Windows XP speed, or lack thereof
John Poltorak
jp@eyup.org
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 21:38:31 +0000
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:22:28PM -0500, Fred A. Miller wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Windows XP speed, or lack thereof
>
> http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-rt4/
>
> Linux is faster then Win2k and XP, but that's not the most interesting
> thing. What I find most interesting is how much slower WinXP is then
> Win2k. 'Look for the graphs.
Interesting....
I notice that no one thought to include OS/2 in a comparison - I suspect
it would win. Even said so on the feedback form.
Maybe one or two others doing the same might get someone at IBM to realise
they still make this fabulous product called OS/2.
And if anyone from OS/2 Voice is reading, why not send out such a
suggestion via VOICENEWS?...
> - --
> Fred A. Miller
> Systems Administrator
> Cornell Univ. Press Services
> fm@cupserv.org
--
John