[Am-info] Re: Robert Bork's anti-trust opinion

Joe Moore Joe.Moore@sdrc.com
Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:55:00 -0500


On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 03:40:17AM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
> This means that access to source code should be considered a requirement 
> of antitrust laws.  This freedom to modify and create value is one of 
> the principle advantages of Linux.  Linux however locks out those who 
> want to sell usage licenses for their software, so Linux is not a 
> panacea (though I take a somewhat perverse joy in making money selling 
> free software despite my recognition that it is not the universal answer 
> to how to produce software).

Your comments are inconsistant.  "Linux locks out those who want to sell
usage licenses for their software" ... "I [ ... ] makeing money selling
free software"

Linux does not lock out those who want to sell usage licenses.  It locks
out those who want to "exclusively sell" limited-use licenses.  In other
words, it locks out those who want a monopoly on software.

--Joe
-- 
When you find yourself on the cutting edge of technology, remember:
   The trailing edge is sharper than the leading edge.