[Am-info] Re: Robert Bork's anti-trust opinion
Joe Moore
Joe.Moore@sdrc.com
Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:55:00 -0500
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 03:40:17AM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
> This means that access to source code should be considered a requirement
> of antitrust laws. This freedom to modify and create value is one of
> the principle advantages of Linux. Linux however locks out those who
> want to sell usage licenses for their software, so Linux is not a
> panacea (though I take a somewhat perverse joy in making money selling
> free software despite my recognition that it is not the universal answer
> to how to produce software).
Your comments are inconsistant. "Linux locks out those who want to sell
usage licenses for their software" ... "I [ ... ] makeing money selling
free software"
Linux does not lock out those who want to sell usage licenses. It locks
out those who want to "exclusively sell" limited-use licenses. In other
words, it locks out those who want a monopoly on software.
--Joe
--
When you find yourself on the cutting edge of technology, remember:
The trailing edge is sharper than the leading edge.