[Am-info] Re: Robert Bork's anti-trust opinion

[sturde@az.com]

In <20011109135302.643CB29BD7@lists.essential.org>, on 11/09/01 
   at 08:53 AM, am-info-request@venice.essential.org said:

>This is beautifully said by Bork.  However, Bork's opinion is purely 
>based on his being paid by Netscape.  He has done a lot to encourage the 
>abandonment of the antitrust laws by the judiciary.  His opinions simply 
>reflect the source of his last check received.

First of all Mr. Bork about 20 years ago wrote a very influential
anti-trust book.  Second, if he is merely a schill, then why did MS
attempt to hire him when the DOJ brought the anti-trust lawsuit and why
did he refuse to represent MS?  I will tell you why, because he analyzed
MS's anti-trust positions and decided they were wrong.

James Sturdevant

-----------------------------------------------------------
sturde@az.com

-----------------------------------------------------------