[Am-info] Microsoft and DOJ
John Poltorak
jp@eyup.org
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 01:30:27 +0000
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 03:43:22PM +0800, Mike Stephen wrote:
> This article was written 2 years ago and is still germane to the solution. I wish the Phoobhaas would
> look into this as a solution to the problem. It is so simple and so elegant, it belies logic as to why it
> was not brought forth as a solution.
> ==========
>
> My own answer to the current debacle was much easier. Just make all OEM manufacturers
> advertise a cost without an operating system (and make it available with no operating system).
> Then the public would know how much the Windows tax really was. It would allow all OEM's to
> compare prices, which would stop Microsoft from preferential treatment of OEM's that "tow the
> Microsoft line" It would also allow other vendors to sell an operating system to the user at the time
> of purchase. The only downfall is that the current batch of operating systems are too complicated
> for the average user to install. Is this a problem with the user? Or is it a problem with the operating
> systems. I say it is with the operating systems, and that all of them could and should be made
> easier to install. No government watchdogs need be utilized, no further need to break up Microsoft,
> and a level playing field for new vendors who want to fill the hard drives of all those new computers.
> I say bundle everything! The more the merrier! RedHat and others could have a full CDROM with all
> kinds of productivity applications. I know IBM could do so with Warp and Lotus products. Star
> Office and Linux would make a nice alternative as well. All we have to do is separate the hardware
> from the software, and then let the market decide.
>
> However the poobhas decided to go a route that in my opinion will do nothing to move the industry
> out of the morass we have fallen into.
>
> From the Desk of Mike Stephen
Unfortunately the question of abolition of the Microsoft Tax never got on
the agenda.
The DOJ settlement proposal was about getting Microsoft to allow *YOU* to
have less Microsoft software on *YOUR* computer. The possibility of having
NO Microsoft software installed in the first place has never even been
entertained.
--
John