[Am-info] The president speaks ebonics

[Mike Stephen]

Alright!  From the Great White North we get to see a potential president who does not have control of the english 
language.  Although the respect of the position held will be honoured, the man will be laughed at behind closed 
doors.
I can assure you Bush is and will be, the laughingstock of the western world.
Maybe he should bring back the "ebonics" issue?
-------------------
 
Nothing's wrong with judging by words 



November 6, 2000

 


BY ROGER EBERT 

I've been swamped with e-mails attacking my comments on George W. Bush's sloppy speech. My correspondents do not 
defend their man; they embrace his goofy way with the English language. I am "elitist," they tell me. "He speaks 
the way regular people speak," one writer says. "We know what he means even if he doesn't say it." 
This is not a stirring recommendation for a man running for the most important job in the world. But hey, they 
say, Ronald Reagan was no towering intellect, and neither was Gerald Ford. 
Reagan was not an intellectual but he was, of course, the "Great Communicator." Whether you agreed with him or 
not, you knew what he was saying. Ford was articulate and plain-spoken. No national candidate in this 
half-century has been more inarticulate, ungrammatical, confused in his speech and astray in his own arguments 
than George W. Bush. 
Does it make me an elitist to say so? No, it makes me a product of St. Mary's Grade School in Champaign-Urbana, 
Ill., where Sister Roseanne taught us that proper speech and grammar were signs of self-respect. And a product of 
Urbana High School, where Marian Seward told us that sloppy writing could not be produced by an orderly mind. 
Both women also told us that a plural noun takes a plural verb. "The people are" not "the people is." And to 
never use a word unless we knew what it meant. 
When one has attended private schools and the Ivy League, is over the age of 50, and still speaks as George Bush 
speaks, such speech suggests laziness and lack of self-respect. Just as Bush would not want to appear in public 
with gravy stains on his tie or mud on his shoes, he should not want to speak like a yahoo. As clothes make the 
man, so speech reveals the mind. 
Is it elitist to hold Bush to a higher standard? I think not. Americans deserve in the highest office a man able 
to express himself clearly and logically--with the ability to inspire us through the clarity and poetry of his 
speech. 
We do not deserve a man who does not care that he sounds uninformed and careless with the language, who misuses 
an alarming percentage of the longer words he employs, and who jokes about it. Only Thursday, he said the 
Democrats "want the federal government controlling Social Security like it's some kind of federal program." It is 
a federal program. Didn't he know that, or did he plug in the wrong sound bite? What a choice. 
The president should be more articulate than the average person. Bush does not speak "the way ordinary people 
speak." The average American is more articulate. If a stranger sat next to you on the bus and spoke as Bush 
speaks, you would quickly form an idea of his intellectual level. It would not be presidential. 


Copyright ) Chicago Sun-Times Inc.

>From the Desk Of Mike Stephen