[Am-info] Corel serves up Windows apps on Linux?
Lewis A. Mettler
lmettler@lamlaw.com
Thu, 06 Jan 2000 10:07:47 -0800
Investors know that it will take unbundling or divestiture of networking
and internet technologies as well as the major product groups before
anyone can mount any meaningful competition to an established monopoly
willing to violate any law as necessary.
Many (on this list and elsewhere) may lie about their knowledge and
understanding in a vain attempt to deceive, fool and defraud others but
the stock price for Microsoft validates 100% of what Judge Jackson found
to be true.
A complete divestiture is best for the industry. Complete unbundling is
a far second.
Maintaining the bundle is simply maintaining the monopoly. (Despite
what Corel might do.)
Any and everyone who promotes bundling is only representing the
financial interests of the monopolist or dominant product. See the
findings of facts. Answer the "examination question" that everyone
agrees with privately but is chicken to say so publicly much less
attempt to disprove the point made.
Paul Rickard wrote:
>
> lmettler@lamlaw.com
>
> >http://www.zdii.com/industry_list.asp?mode=news&doc_id=BW20000106BW0213&ti
> >cker=CORL
>
> With the various URLs I've seen floating by today about Intel and
> Corel, plus Apple's show yesterday, I'm really starting to worry about
> old friend Windows.. Unfortunately, Microsoft does still own all those
> interests in the telcos, so the company itself is much healthier than its
> flagship product. The magic stock that refuses to take a hit...
>
> ======== Paul Rickard, Editor of The Microsoft Boycott Campaign =======
> --------------------------------[ Http://www.msboycott.com ]-----------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Am-info mailing list
> Am-info@lists.essential.org
> http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/am-info
--
Lewis A. Mettler, Esq.(Attorney and Software Developer)
lmettler@LAMLaw.com
http://www.lamlaw.com/ (detailed review of the Microsoft antitrust
trial)