[A2k] WIPO Development Agenda -surprising news

Gwen Hinze gwen@eff.org
Thu Nov 19 14:43:11 2009


The dialogue was as I pasted below.

The question was asked and the answer was provided in a meeting of the
WIPO Member States, intergovernmental organizations and accredited non-
governmental organizations in the Committee on Development and IP, in
the presence of representatives of the WIPO Secretariat.


Gwen Hinze
On Nov 19, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Jeffrey A. Williams wrote:

> Gwen and all,
>
>  Just out of curiosity did the legal offices staff person
> offer any explanation as to why no report was done or is
> forthcomming?  Secondly was this same staff person ask
> specifically why they were not complying with UN article
> 6 as you indicated below?  Has the UN secretariat been
> formally or informally notified that the WIPO legal staff
> and/or those otherwise responsible withing WIPO are failing
> to comply with Artyicle 6 requirements?
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gwen Hinze <gwen@eff.org>
>> Sent: Nov 19, 2009 6:14 AM
>> To: Gwen Hinze <gwen@eff.org>
>> Cc: a2k discuss list <a2k@lists.essential.org>, The Public Voice <coalition@mailman.thepublicvoice.org
>> >
>> Subject: Re: [A2k] WIPO Development Agenda -surprising news
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Clarification and some additional information on this.
>>
>> The context is discussion of paragraph 8 of a proposal from the
>> delegations of Algeria, Brazil and Pakistan, supported by India,
>> on a
>> mechanism for coordination within WIPO of implementation of the
>> Development Agenda. Paragraph 8 of that proposal requires WIPO to
>> provide a report on Development Agenda implementation (presumably
>> part
>> of its annual report) to the UN, in accordance with WIPO's obligation
>> to provide an annual report to the UN under Article 6 of the 1974 UN-
>> WIPO Agreement (the agreement under which WIPO became a specialist
>> body of the UN).
>>
>> Here are my notes of the dialogue that took place this in the
>> morning's CDIP session:
>>
>> Question from delegate of France to female member of WIPO's Legal
>> Counsel's Office:
>>
>> I think I addressed another question to the Secretariat yesterday
>> about paragraph 8. On Article 6 of the UN-WIPO Agreement, what is the
>> current status of implementation of this obligation? Are annual
>> reports provided?
>>
>> Legal Counsel's Office staff person: At present, no. No such report
>> is
>> being made to the UN.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Nov 19, 2009, at 2:56 AM, Gwen Hinze wrote:
>>
>>> At this morning' session of the WIPO CDIP 4, legal counsel from
>>> WIPO's
>>> Office of Legal Counsel just stated that WIPO is not in compliance
>>> with its obligation to report to the UN under Article 6 of the 1974
>>> UN-
>>> WIPO Agreement.
>>>
>>> <http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/agreement/index.html>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gwen Hinze
>>> International Policy Director
>>> Electronic Frontier Foundation
>>> email:gwen@eff.org
>>> Tel.: + 1 415 436 9333 x110
>>>
>>> Please support EFF - Working to protect your digital rights and
>>> freedom of speech since 1990
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> A2k mailing list
>>> A2k@lists.essential.org
>>> http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/a2k
>>
>> --
>> Gwen Hinze
>> International Policy Director
>> Electronic Frontier Foundation
>> email:gwen@eff.org
>> Tel.: + 1 415 436 9333 x110
>>
>> Please support EFF - Working to protect your digital rights and
>> freedom of speech since 1990
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> A2k mailing list
>> A2k@lists.essential.org
>> http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/a2k
>
> Regards,
>
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 294k members/stakeholders strong!)
> "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
>   Abraham Lincoln
>
> "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
> very
> often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
>
> "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
> liability
> depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> ===============================================================
> Updated 1/26/04
> CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
> div. of
> Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
> ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Phone: 214-244-4827
>

--
Gwen Hinze
International Policy Director
Electronic Frontier Foundation
email:gwen@eff.org
Tel.: + 1 415 436 9333 x110

Please support EFF - Working to protect your digital rights and
freedom of speech since 1990