[A2k] Re: Right to read (Manon Ress) Still Backwards

Sat May 9 18:59:01 2009

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]

While this message is on point and helps me to clarify my adamant support f=
or these rights, a little simple history again shows the backwardness of ou=
r approach.
=A0
What we did while codifying, internationalizing and uniformallyzing our cur=
rent "legitmate legal structure" was take existing laws and update them.
=A0
But think about it. Those that existed did not simply include all persons. =
We had to go back and include things like; All races, disabilities, women, =
even oppressed religious groups and children. Most countries had to go back=
 and make exception/mandates to include languages that were not official ye=
t spoken by all indigenous.
=A0
We never as a Global society, go back and redraft and make assumptions we j=
ust assume today. People in the US just accept the Constitutional amendment=
s -- my goodness they were necessary because our core founding docs exclude=
d blacks, indians, children and women=A0 --- the list and amendments go on =
and on.
There is to this day no constitutional amendment including folks with disab=
ilities. We have the ADA which damn well is not the same. The blind were no=
t included or assumed in the declaring of universal inalienable human right=
s. Damn sure neither were mixed race like Obama.
=A0
We have got to forge and force the reevaluation of holding priviledges abov=
e rights. Copyright is not a right.
=A0
=A0From: Manon Ress <manon.ress@keionline.org>
To: a2k discuss list <a2k@lists.essential.org>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 07:13:35 -0400
Subject: [A2k] Dan Pescod:=A0 Right to read

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]

From: "Pescod, Dan" <Dan.Pescod@rnib.org.uk>
Date: May 6, 2009 9:47:56 AM EDT
To: <a2k-admin@lists.essential.org>
Subject: Right to read

Hi all,

I don=3D92t post very often here, but just thought on behalf of the World
Blind Union that I might clarify something that came up yesterday.

Paul Lehto yesterday posted to say : "Seeking treaty rights without at
all times saying in effect "this is just spelling out existing rights
for officials too ignorant to figure this out" is going down the wrong
road, and going down the wrong road on one's knees, as it were."

I think I agree this needs to be made explicit, though I might not
tell the officials in question that they are ignorant!

WBU is indeed using the WIPO treaty proposal to spell out existing
rights, rather than in effect creating new rights.
Interestingly, there was debate at one time about whether the UN
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) itself
was needed. The argument there was that it would only rehash human
rights that already existed. It was finally agreed that the CRPD does
NOT confer new rights on disabled people that the rest of us do not
have in other human rights conventions. However, it was deemed
necessary to proceed with that treaty because it allows society to
understand HOW it must adjust to fully meet the already existent
rights of millions of disabled people.

The WIPO treaty proposal would in turn create a mechanism to
facilitate the enjoyment of basic human rights spelled out in the CRPD
in the specific area of access to published works. We regularly allude
to this being a way to meet existing rights with the slogan "right to
read". In effect, the right to read does already exist in law in the
CRPD - see especially Article 21 (also Article 9). I=3D92ve posted
extracts of these at the end of this note.

I hope that helps.

Dan

"Article 21 Freedom of expression and opinion, and access to information

States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to ensure that
persons with disabilities can exercise the right to freedom of
expression and opinion, including the freedom to seek, receive and
impart information and ideas on an equal basis with others and through
all forms of communication of their choice, as defined in article 2 of
the present Convention, including by:

a) Providing information intended for the general public to persons
with disabilities in accessible formats and technologies appropriate
to different kinds of disabilities in a timely manner and without
additional cost;

b) Accepting and facilitating the use of sign languages, Braille,
augmentative and alternative communication, and all other accessible
means, modes and formats of communication of their choice by persons
with disabilities in official interactions;

c) Urging private entities that provide services to the general
public, including through the Internet, to provide information and
services in accessible and usable formats for persons with disabilities;

d) Encouraging the mass media, including providers of information
through the Internet, to make their services accessible to persons
with disabilities;

e) Recognizing and promoting the use of sign languages."

Furthermore, Article 30, Participation in cultural life, recreation,
leisure and sport, states among other things:

"1. States Parties recognize the right of persons with disabilities to
take part on an equal basis with others in cultural life, and shall
take all appropriate measures to ensure that persons with disabilities:

a) Enjoy access to cultural materials in accessible formats;

3. States Parties shall take all appropriate steps, in accordance with
international law, to ensure that laws protecting intellectual
property rights do not constitute an unreasonable or discriminatory
barrier to access by persons with disabilities to cultural materials."

Dan

--

=A0 DISCLAIMER:

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
confidential and may be privileged.=A0 If you are not the intended
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it
and any attachments from your system.

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants.=A0 However, it
cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk

This message has been scanned for viruses by Websense Hosted Security
-=A0 http://www.websense.com/content/HostedEmailSecurity.aspx

***************************************************************************
Manon Ress
manon.ress@keionline.org
Knowledge Ecology International
1621 Connecticut Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20009 USA
Tel.:=A0 +1.202.332.2670, Fax: +1.202.332.2673

--__--__--

_______________________________________________
A2k mailing list
A2k@lists.essential.org
http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/a2k

End of A2k Digest

________________________________