[A2k] EU Parliament demands more transparency on ACTA

Thu Mar 12 16:16:01 2009

Judit and all,

  Well it's about time!  Seems to me though that this is akin to
shutting the barn door after the horse is out, and in this particular
case, the horse has been out for some time.  Transparency can only
be effective if it is timely.  After the fact is usually late if not more
often than not, too late...

Judit Rius Sanjuan wrote:

> The EU Parliament just passed a resolution demanding more transparency
> to the EU Commission, including on the ACTA negotiation.
>
> "Members also call the Commission to make available all documents
> related to the ongoing international negotiations on the Anti-
> Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) -which will contain a new
> international benchmark on intellectual property right enforcement"
>
> Press Release : Access to documents: The European parliament demands
> more transparency
> Justice and home affairs - 11-03-2009 - 14:30
> Source: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/infopress_page/019-51409-068-03-11-902-20090310IPR51408-09-03-2009-2009-false/default_en.htm
>
> No legislative documents should be kept secret: this must be a basic
> principle of the reformed policy on access to documents, the European
> Parliament says in a vote on a new EU rules on the issue. Members
> adopted amendments to the draft proposal but postponed the vote on the
> legislative resolution, leaving the door open for further negotiations
> and a first-reading agreement.
>
> The European Parliament adopted amendments on the basis of a
> codecision report drafted by Michael CASHMAN (PES, UK) in order to
> revise the 2001 regulation on access to documents, which has been
> followed by a number of rulings by the Court of Justice. The revised
> regulation will incorporate these rulings into a single framework for
> all the institutions, but MEPs want to go further.
>
> Legislative vote postponed
>
> MEPs adopted the amended proposal by 439 votes in favour, 200 against
> and 57 abstentions, but postponed the vote on the legislative
> resolution in order to leave the possibility for the European
> commission to modify its proposal, and for the European Parliament to
> negotiate a first reading agreement with Council after the summer, as
> a new parliamentary term will start in June. Council will then be
> chaired by the Swedish presidency, which made a priority of the issue
> of transparency and already welcomed the Cashman report in a public
> declaration.
>
> In its report, the House includes amendments clarifying the term
> "document", defining it as any data or content, whatever its medium,
> concerning a matter relating to the policies, activities and decisions
> falling within the institution's sphere of responsibility.  MEPs also
> make a distinction between legislative and non-legislative documents:
> the former should always be available to the public and may not be
> kept secret on the grounds that this could undermine the decision-
> making process of the institutions. Measures of general scope adopted
> by the Council and the Commission without associating the European
> Parliament shall also be considered "legislative" by way of exception.
>
> Transparency in Member States too
>
> Documents originating from a Member State and received by the EU
> institutions should also be disclosed, after consultation of the
> Member state - but this does not give them a right of veto, MEPs say.
> Member States shall seek to ensure that an equivalent level of
> transparency is granted in relation to national measures implementing
> acts of the EU.
>
> The text also protects political activity and independence of MEPs,
> reminding that documents and electronic records which an MEP has
> received, drafted or sent are not to be considered as "documents" in
> the sense of this regulation, as they are covered by the Statute for
> Members of the European Parliament.
>
> A single EU portal on the web
>
> Parliament added an article on legislative transparency, stating that
> these documents must be available on an inter-institutional website.
> Preparatory documents, impact studies, legal opinions and other
> documents must also be published.
>
> "EU classified": a new category of documents
>
> MEPs have also devised a scale for classifying documents, from "EU
> restricted" to "EU top secret", for documents whose unauthorised
> disclosure could harm the interests of the European Union or its
> Member States. Reasons must be given why access to a document is
> refused. And documents on legislative procedures must not be
> classified, say MEPs.
> Exceptions shall only apply for the period during which protection is
> justified and may only apply for 30 years, unless the exception
> relates to the privacy or integrity of the individual.
>
> Financial transparency
>
> Information relating to the EU budget, its implementation and
> beneficiaries of EU funds and grants should also be public and
> accessible to citizens via a specific website.
>
> Documents on International agreements to be made public
>
> International accords on the sharing of confidential information
> concluded in the name of the EU (such as the agreement with the USA on
> passenger name records or "PNR"), must not give a non-EU country or an
> international organisation the right to prevent the European
> Parliament from accessing confidential information.
>
> Members also call the Commission to make available all documents
> related to the ongoing international negotiations on the Anti-
> Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) - which will contain a new
> international benchmark on intellectual property right enforcement.
>
> A register of lobbyists
>
> MEPs call for an inter-institutional register of lobbyists to be set
> up, and the names, titles and functions of the lobbyists should be
> made public, as should those of EU officials, unless this information
> would affect the privacy or integrity of the individual.
>
> A special oversight committee made up of MEPs should be set up and
> should have access to classified documents.  Each directorate-general
> of every institution should designate a person responsible for
> ensuring that the regulation is properly implemented.
>
> Lastly, requests for paper copies of documents must be processed
> within 15 days, as compared to the 30 days suggested in the initial
> proposal.
>
> Judit Rius Sanjuan
> Attorney
> Knowledge Ecology International / Essential Information
> www.keionline.org / www.cptech.org
> Phone: +1.202 332 2670, ext 18
>
> _______________________________________________
> A2k mailing list
> A2k@lists.essential.org
> http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/a2k

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln
"YES WE CAN!"  Barack ( Berry ) Obama

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
My Phone: 214-244-4827