[A2k] EU Parliament demands more transparency on ACTA

[Judit Rius Sanjuan]

The EU Parliament just passed a resolution demanding more transparency
to the EU Commission, including on the ACTA negotiation.

"Members also call the Commission to make available all documents
related to the ongoing international negotiations on the Anti-
Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) -which will contain a new
international benchmark on intellectual property right enforcement"



Press Release : Access to documents: The European parliament demands
more transparency
Justice and home affairs - 11-03-2009 - 14:30
Source: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/infopress_page/019-51409-068-03-11-902-20090310IPR51408-09-03-2009-2009-false/default_en.htm

No legislative documents should be kept secret: this must be a basic
principle of the reformed policy on access to documents, the European
Parliament says in a vote on a new EU rules on the issue. Members
adopted amendments to the draft proposal but postponed the vote on the
legislative resolution, leaving the door open for further negotiations
and a first-reading agreement.

The European Parliament adopted amendments on the basis of a
codecision report drafted by Michael CASHMAN (PES, UK) in order to
revise the 2001 regulation on access to documents, which has been
followed by a number of rulings by the Court of Justice. The revised
regulation will incorporate these rulings into a single framework for
all the institutions, but MEPs want to go further.

Legislative vote postponed

MEPs adopted the amended proposal by 439 votes in favour, 200 against
and 57 abstentions, but postponed the vote on the legislative
resolution in order to leave the possibility for the European
commission to modify its proposal, and for the European Parliament to
negotiate a first reading agreement with Council after the summer, as
a new parliamentary term will start in June. Council will then be
chaired by the Swedish presidency, which made a priority of the issue
of transparency and already welcomed the Cashman report in a public
declaration.

In its report, the House includes amendments clarifying the term
"document", defining it as any data or content, whatever its medium,
concerning a matter relating to the policies, activities and decisions
falling within the institution's sphere of responsibility.  MEPs also
make a distinction between legislative and non-legislative documents:
the former should always be available to the public and may not be
kept secret on the grounds that this could undermine the decision-
making process of the institutions. Measures of general scope adopted
by the Council and the Commission without associating the European
Parliament shall also be considered "legislative" by way of exception.

Transparency in Member States too

Documents originating from a Member State and received by the EU
institutions should also be disclosed, after consultation of the
Member state - but this does not give them a right of veto, MEPs say.
Member States shall seek to ensure that an equivalent level of
transparency is granted in relation to national measures implementing
acts of the EU.

The text also protects political activity and independence of MEPs,
reminding that documents and electronic records which an MEP has
received, drafted or sent are not to be considered as "documents" in
the sense of this regulation, as they are covered by the Statute for
Members of the European Parliament.

A single EU portal on the web

Parliament added an article on legislative transparency, stating that
these documents must be available on an inter-institutional website.
Preparatory documents, impact studies, legal opinions and other
documents must also be published.

"EU classified": a new category of documents

MEPs have also devised a scale for classifying documents, from "EU
restricted" to "EU top secret", for documents whose unauthorised
disclosure could harm the interests of the European Union or its
Member States. Reasons must be given why access to a document is
refused. And documents on legislative procedures must not be
classified, say MEPs.
Exceptions shall only apply for the period during which protection is
justified and may only apply for 30 years, unless the exception
relates to the privacy or integrity of the individual.

Financial transparency

Information relating to the EU budget, its implementation and
beneficiaries of EU funds and grants should also be public and
accessible to citizens via a specific website.

Documents on International agreements to be made public

International accords on the sharing of confidential information
concluded in the name of the EU (such as the agreement with the USA on
passenger name records or "PNR"), must not give a non-EU country or an
international organisation the right to prevent the European
Parliament from accessing confidential information.

Members also call the Commission to make available all documents
related to the ongoing international negotiations on the Anti-
Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) - which will contain a new
international benchmark on intellectual property right enforcement.

A register of lobbyists

MEPs call for an inter-institutional register of lobbyists to be set
up, and the names, titles and functions of the lobbyists should be
made public, as should those of EU officials, unless this information
would affect the privacy or integrity of the individual.

A special oversight committee made up of MEPs should be set up and
should have access to classified documents.  Each directorate-general
of every institution should designate a person responsible for
ensuring that the regulation is properly implemented.

Lastly, requests for paper copies of documents must be processed
within 15 days, as compared to the 30 days suggested in the initial
proposal.


Judit Rius Sanjuan
Attorney
Knowledge Ecology International / Essential Information
www.keionline.org / www.cptech.org
Phone: +1.202 332 2670, ext 18