[A2k] Re: [Upd-discuss] Fwd: Blind Groups Sue ASU flor KindleUse
Jeffrey A. Williams
jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Thu Jul 2 15:25:03 2009
Frederico and all,
Both arguments and therefore points of view are correct and ethical
here. Kindle is part of the problem and DRM is the framework for
Kindle becoming a problem. Still neither perspective should not be
argued, instead both should be. The contrived denigration or restriction
of the Blind or sight impaired intentionally is to a degree lessor or greater,
to everyone. Such should always be opposed and opposed strongly!
This said, our members as a short term solution are boycotting all
Amazon products and services accordingly, and some of our members
have short sold their stock holdings in Amazon as a result. This will
continue until or unless Amazon changes the error in it's ways.
Federico Heinz wrote:
> On 30/06/2009, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> > Federico, don't you agree that the freedom of access to knowledge is
> > threatened by the risk that through the "Kindle", Amazon might succeed
> > in creating for itself effectively a gatekeeper role with regard to
> > access to knowledge?
>
> Not really. The risk of a Kindle monopoly doesn't seem all that high to me.
> Everything with a screen is being repurposed as a reader nowadays. The problem
> is not the Kindle, it's DRM, especially under DMCA-like conditions.
>
> > [...] Such an alliance will succeed in turning the tide of international law
> > if and only if we succeed in building relationships of collaboration, trust
> > and mutual support between the diverse interest groups.
>
> And in order to do that, each and every one of the members of that alliance
> must fight for the whole thing, and not just for their specific portion. This
> means, always communicate that the problem is "access to knowledge" and that
> "access to knowledge for the {blind, poor, illiterate, dark-haired}" is just an
> illustrative example of the general damage being done.
>
> Those universities' plans with the DRM'ed books read like they got the idea
> from Richard's "Right to Read". It affects blind students, it is true. But it
> also affects all students.
>
> What's worse, we can't count on textbook publishers acting stupidly *all* of
> the time. At some point, one or more of them is bound to figure out that the
> lock on the Kindle's text-to-speech feature is a completely boneheaded idea,
> particularly for books which are not likely candidates for audiobooks (say,
> Calculus 101), and allow the feature for them. As a result, those universities
> will be perceived as being concerned with the rights of the visually impaired,
> and doing the right thing for them, when in fact they will be doing the wrong
> thing for everyone.
>
> Fede
> _______________________________________________
> A2k mailing list
> A2k@lists.essential.org
> http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/a2k
Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"YES WE CAN!" Barack ( Berry ) Obama
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
My Phone: 214-244-4827