[A2k] IP-Watch: World Customs Organization Publications Copyright Policy Questioned

[IP-Watch]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]

 <http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/wp-trackback.php?p=1280>
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/wp-trackback.php?p=1280


Intellectual Property Watch


World Customs Organization Publications Copyright Policy Questioned


By William New
In an unusual policy for an international organisation, the World Customs
Organization imposes copyright over every document its bodies produce, even
agendas, which means that no document can be reproduced without the
organisation's express consent.

But now some member governments are questioning this practice, which they
say was intended only for the organisation to protect the rights in
publications made for sale or containing proprietary information, and is now
blocking access to information about the organisation's work.

The issue has come to a head in recent months as part of a growing
controversy around a WCO working group on enforcement that potentially puts
customs officials in the role of judging counterfeit and pirated goods
directly and without judges or other authorities.

The next and fourth meeting of the SECURE (Standards to be Employed by
Customs for Uniform Rights Enforcement) working group is 30-31 October at
the WCO in Brussels. Quoting from a copy of the agenda obtained by
Intellectual Property Watch, expected items for discussion include adoption
of the third working group report; discussion and adoption of the terms of
reference working draft and revised proposed action plan; review and further
development of the working draft of the SECURE document of 25 April; a
private-sector presentation by Philips; and under other business, a
presentation by the UN Universal Postal Union, and, lastly, "discussion of
process document from Brazil and Argentina."

Brazil and Argentina requested the agenda item be called, "Transparency,
legitimacy and a member-driven process," but the WCO secretariat chose to
call it simply a "discussion of process document."

In late September, Brazil and Argentina asked the secretariat to circulate a
document entitled, "Ensuring transparency and a legitimate, member-driven
process in the SECURE working group." The author governments requested the
document to be considered an official document, but it was only considered a
"non-paper," the sources said.

At the last meeting of the SECURE working group in June, several members,
including Argentina, Brazil, China, Cuba, Ecuador and Uruguay, raised the
concern that their voices were not heard in the preparation of the draft set
of standards on enforcement (
<http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/wp-trackback.php?p=1117> IPW, Enforcement,
27 June 2008). Intellectual Property Watch was ordered by WCO to take down a
document from that meeting.

The 189-member Universal Postal Union recently came under scrutiny as well
for a sudden upswing in discussion of enforcement activities. The UPU
Congress in August reportedly adopted a resolution that encouraged members
to identify counterfeit and pirated items in the postal network and to
cooperate with the relevant national and international authorities in
awareness-raising initiatives to prevent illegal circulation of counterfeit
goods. But a number of countries were concerned that the postal service did
not have the scope or necessary legal and other expertise to implement such
a resolution, in particular the expertise to determine whether a product is
counterfeit or violates IP laws. The resolution's adoption was appealed,
according to sources.

Publication Policy or Information Control?

The WCO limits circulation of its documents in several ways. It posts to
documents, even meeting agendas, that "for reasons of economy, documents are
printed in limited number. Delegates are kindly asked to bring their copies
to meetings and not to request additional copies." WCO then adds: "Copyright
C 2008 World Customs Organization. All rights reserved. Requests and
inquiries concerning translation, reproduction and adaptation rights should
be addressed to copyright@wcoomd.org."

In order to access documents, passwords are needed, according to a source.
But it is unclear why a copyright is used to protect negotiating documents
used by elected governments, when the documents are not expected to be
offered for sale or any other apparent disadvantage to the organisation's
secretariat.

The WCO could not comment on its copyright policy by presstime. New WCO
Secretary General Kunio Mikuriya takes office in the new year.

Intellectual Property Watch





 <http://www.ip-watch.org>





--