[A2k] SUNS: L&E in copyright vital for South countries

[Sangeeta]

Below is an article on Exceptions and Limitations for libraries prepared by
Teresa Hackett.

Best Regards
Sangeeta Shashikant
Third World Network
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Exceptions and limitations" in copyright vital for South countries
SUNS #6581 Monday 3 November 2008

Dublin, 31 Oct (Teresa Hackett*) -- Flexibilities in the copyright area,
known as exceptions and limitations, are important especially for developing
countries and this issue will be a highlight of a WIPO copyright meeting
this coming week.

On 3-7 November, WIPO's Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights
(SCCR/17) will resume discussions on the issue following up from the start
of earnest discussion at the 10-12 March meeting.

In their preliminary remarks, developing countries had highlighted their
need for flexibilities offered by exceptions and limitations due to their
socioeconomic conditions, including technological, financial and human
resource constraints. Indeed, they view their capacity to access knowledge
goods as being defined primarily by exceptions and limitations.

The debate is overdue as countries grapple with how to extend and apply
exceptions and limitations to the digital environment. Entrepreneurs
developing innovative information and communication technology (ICT)
services and users of copyrighted material have experienced obstacles and
legal uncertainty. This has undermined the development and use of digital
technologies which have so much to offer developing countries.

The original purpose of copyright law is to encourage creativity and
learning. It grants  legal protection to creators to exploit their works,
while also enabling access to society to encourage research, innovation and
further creativity.

Therefore, copyright was meant to balance the need to protect creators with
the user's need to access information and knowledge goods. This balance is
sought in two ways. First, the right is granted for a limited amount of
time. The international standard term of protection for a literary work is
the author's life plus 50 years after death (latterly other countries, led
by Europe and the US, have extended the term of protection).

Second, the rights are subject to certain exceptions and limitations to
enable access to copyrighted works. Exceptions and limitations are therefore
a fundamental part of the copyright system - a mechanism for access to
knowledge and thus for human social and economic development.

The world's first international copyright treaty, the Berne Convention for
the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1886), which is incorporated
into the WTO's TRIPS Agreement, sets out the exclusive rights granted to
creators and other rightsholders. The Convention also makes provision for a
variety of exceptions and limitations subject to certain conditions.

The WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) Agreed Statement concerning Article 10
Limitations and Exceptions states that countries may carry forward and
extend into the digital environment limitations and exceptions in their
national laws which have been considered acceptable under the Berne
Convention and that new exceptions and limitations appropriate to the
digital environment may be devised.

Save for Article 10(1) of the Berne Convention which permits quotation of
copyrighted works, exceptions and limitations are discretionary and are left
for national governments to decide. This provides countries with the
flexibility to create access regimes that meet national educational,
cultural and development needs.

However, the fact that copyright owners' exclusive rights are international
and guaranteed, and exceptions and limitations to the monopoly rights are
national and optional is perceived as creating an inherent imbalance in the
copyright system.

It has led to a patchwork of national exceptions and limitations that do not
adequately meet the needs of the global networked environment, hindering in
particular cross-border activities, such as distance learning, digitisation
projects by libraries and exchange of material in accessible formats for
blind and visually impaired people.

In addition, revisions and new treaties over the years have introduced new
exclusive rights, new subject matter, and new modes of exploitation.
Exceptions and limitations have not evolved at the same pace as the
development of authors' and other rightsholders' rights.

Global trends towards increased protections and stronger enforcement regimes
hamper access to copyrighted content, create problems for libraries and
endanger the proper functioning of the copyright system. Moreover, through
bilateral trade agreements, developing countries are made to adopt
international standards of copyright protection that go beyond their
WTO-TRIPS obligations.

There are three broad categories of exceptions and limitations. The first
safeguards fundamental user rights concerning the individual. Examples
include public speeches, the right to make quotations, the reporting of
current events, the right to parody, reproductions for private
non-commercial use and home taping of audio or audio-visual works.

The second category reflects commercial interest, industry practice and
competition. This includes press reviews, ephemeral recordings by
broadcasting organisations, museum catalogues, de-compilation/reverse
engineering of computer programs for interoperability.

The third category concerns society at large and promotes the dissemination
of knowledge and information. It includes provisions for libraries,
educators for teaching and research, people with disabilities, reporting of
parliamentary and judicial proceedings and religious celebrations.

In addition, some countries have an "all-purpose" general exception. In the
US, this is known as the doctrine of "fair use". Codified in US copyright
law, it has evolved through court decisions over the years.

The UK has a similar concept known as "fair dealing", which covers mainly
research and private study, criticism and review, and news reporting. The
precise definition and interpretation of fair dealing is ultimately
determined by the courts. Countries which are former UK colonies are likely
to have inherited British copyright law and hence the fair dealing
provision.

Libraries are deeply affected by copyright law. The mission of libraries is
to collect, organise, preserve and make available the world's cultural and
scientific heritage for current and future generations. Different types of
libraries (such as the national library, public libraries, academic
libraries and workplace libraries) serve different people and purposes.

But they all facilitate sound democratic governance and the development of
society by providing access to information, ideas and works of the
imagination that people, communities and organisations need.

Libraries in developing countries are contributing to national development
by supporting education and training. As the main purchasers of expensive
reference works, online databases and electronic journals, they are
fostering the creation of a market for information products, especially for
local content industries.

Digital technologies are transforming how copyrighted works are created,
disseminated and used, as well as how libraries and archives preserve and
make these works available. ICTs create the potential to level the playing
field so that even people in poor countries have access to top quality
global resources.

For example, millions of academics and researchers in developing countries
are benefiting from access to major databases of journals in humanities and
literature, science and technology and business information, through their
libraries, such as those available through the eIFL.net consortium
(www.eifl.net).  In future, students in developing countries can have access
to the same resources as a student in the West.

Copyright law governs the ownership, control and distribution of knowledge.
The role of libraries is to provide people with access to knowledge and
information. Copyright is therefore a professional issue for librarians.

Exceptions and limitations are the cornerstone of access to copyrighted
content. Without them, copyright owners would have a complete monopoly over
use of copyrighted materials. Works in copyright could only be sold and
lent.  Libraries, and the people using them, could only view or read
copyrighted materials. All other uses would require permission.

This would threaten the functioning of libraries and affect the public
interest including interfering with the free flow of information. Thus,
libraries cherish the public policy goals enshrined in the principle of
exceptions and limitations, and insist on their continued applicability in
the digital age.

Today, we live in a global digital environment. But the exceptions and
limitations were developed in the analogue world. They are still paper-bound
although the basic format for most content has become digital.

The agreed statement to Article 10 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty was an
attempt to provide a remedy for such future issues. More than a decade on,
the issues are too complex to be addressed solely by this general statement
expressing an intention. This is why libraries and others have been calling
for a minimum set of exceptions and limitations, for example, as part of an
international treaty on Access to Knowledge.

The recent WIPO Study on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for
Libraries and Archives (SCCR/17/2) for the first time gathers library
exceptions and provides a survey of the copyright law of 149 WIPO Member
States.

It concludes that the prevalence of statutory library exceptions indicate
that policy makers recognise the important role that copyright law plays in
the ability of citizens to have continuing access to library materials. But
the study also finds that there is a demand amongst librarians for more
supportive legislation and clearer laws that would apply to the services
they deliver.

Inadequate exceptions and limitations may result in the loss of
irreplaceable cultural and scientific heritage or it may impose unrealistic
costs on libraries and their patrons. Here are some common scenarios:

1. Libraries contain a wide variety of print material often not available
anywhere else in the world but which are of important historical, political
and cultural value e.g. newspaper collections. Without an appropriate
exception, the library cannot copy or digitise the newspaper in order to
preserve it. Unless developing countries have adequate exceptions for
archiving and preservation purposes, their documentary heritage may
disappear and may not be available to future generations.

2. The process of digitisation is expensive and libraries often cooperate
with partners in other countries to share resources. However, if
preservation exceptions in each country are different, libraries cannot
participate equally as the burden of digitisation will be placed on those
with more liberal regimes, while the others will not have access to the
digitised content. If libraries in developing countries do not have adequate
provisions, they may find it difficult to attract partners in other
countries and they may be left out of important digitisation projects.

3. A public library buys an expensive set of encyclopedias on CD-ROM,
popular with children doing their homework in the library. One of the CDs
gets damaged and cannot be used. It is not possible to buy a single
replacement disk. Unless the library is able to make a back-up copy, the
entire set loses its value. The library either has to re-purchase the whole
set or if it cannot afford to do this, the children are deprived of the use
of the encyclopedia.

4. Literacy classes for adults are held in the library. The literacy
coordinator visits the library to select the texts for the next class, a
magazine article and a poem, and to arrange for photocopies to be made for
the students. Without appropriate exceptions, the library may be prevented
from providing this service, which may even restrict copies from being made
at all.

Thus, certain core exceptions and limitations are essential for libraries to
fulfill their public interest mission and the needs of their users. These
include exceptions and limitations for:

* reproduction for libraries and archives to enable preservation and
archiving of a nation's cultural and scientific heritage (print and
digital), as well as for general purposes to enable the library to fulfill
its mission;

* inter-library document supply: a collaborative system of resource sharing
amongst libraries because no single library can own every book, journal or
published work;

* reproduction for private purposes and research, so that a person can make
copies for a variety of non-commercial purposes in their everyday lives, one
of the most universally accepted limitations and exceptions in national
copyright laws;

* the use of quotations is important for educational, research and
entertainment;

* reproduction for educational activities, key to economic and social
development, to facilitate day-to-day work in teaching and learning
institutions, and to maximise the use of learning resources;

* reproduction for translations to enable a person to read in their own
language considered to be essential for social and economic inclusion.

* reproduction for persons with disabilities to enable up-to-date material
to be made available in accessible formats at low cost;

* temporary reproduction in the internal storage area of a computer without
which is impossible to access digital material;

* communication to the public for educational and research purposes for
countries that have implemented the WCT.

Crucially, exceptions and limitations should be not overridden by
technological protection measures (TPMs) or by contract.

Exceptions and limitations are the current focus of attention by
legislators, policy makers and academics in several countries. It is thus
timely for this issue to be debated at WIPO.

WIPO studies will be presented at an information session during SCCR/17
(exceptions and limitations in the digital environment by Ricketson,
SCCR/9/7; for blind and visually impaired people by Sullivan, SCCR/15/7; and
libraries and archives by Crews, SCCR/17/2).

Leading academics Professor Ruth Okediji and Professor Bernt Hugenholtz made
a recommendation in their report "Conceiving an International Instrument on
Limitations and Exceptions to Copyright" (2008) that a global instrument on
limitations and exceptions is necessary.

The WIPO meeting thus comes at a time when there is increasing desire by
many to find a solution that enables contemporary copyright law to meet the
legitimate needs of users in the knowledge society.

(*Teresa Hackett, a librarian with a legal background, manages "eIFL-IP
Advocacy for Access to Knowledge: copyright and libraries", a programme of
Electronic Information for Libraries (www.eifl.net). She wrote this comment
for SUNS.)+