[A2k] Re: [Ip-health] SUNS: Slow progress in talks on IPRs and innovation

Sangeeta ssangeeta@myjaring.net
Fri Mar 28 11:47:11 2008


I agree wholeheartedly. The intent of that para was not to say that it
should limited. The intent was more to state factually what is the current
situation in the negotiations i.e. That members had not agreed.

Perhaps we should have clarified.

Thanks
Sangeeta


On 3/29/08 12:32 AM, "mko" <mko@bu.edu> wrote:

>
> On 3/27/08 6:00 AM, "Sangeeta" <ssangeeta@myjaring.net> wrote:
>
>> [One point lacking agreement is whether the Global Strategy applies only to
>> 14 diseases, as proposed by the WHO Secretariat, or to a broader range of
>> diseases as proposed by some member states - see SUNS #6360 of 7 November
>> 2007.]
>
> Limiting the WHO IGWG Global Strategy to 14 diseases would be a terrible
> error.  See http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1090270.
>
> Kevin Outterson
> Associate Professor of Law & Director of the Health Law Program
> Boston University School of Law
> 765 Commonwealth Ave., Boston  MA  02215
> 617 353 3103
> http://ssrn.com/author=340746
>
>