[A2k] EU : Copyright term extension for performers proposed

Michelle Childs michelle.childs@cptech.org
Thu Feb 21 16:28:17 2008


There has been some work done on this with more coming. As part of the
Gowers review in the UK  Cambridge University was commissioned to do
an economic review  of the proposal for a term extension. It can be
found here:
http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/gowers_review_intellectua=
l_property/gowersreview_index.cfm
The Gowers report concluded that there should not be such a extension.

Michelle Childs
Head of European Affairs
Knowledge Ecology International
michelle.childs@cptech.org

"The world we have made, as a result of the level of thinking we have
done thus far, creates problems we cannot solve at the same level of
thinking at which we created them=94 Albert Einstein

On 19 Feb 2008, at 16:05, Riaz K Tayob wrote:

> Is there any information on the share of the proceeds that go to the
> creators/innovators of works compared with the market intermediaries
> (like big music labels)?
>
> riaz
>
> Michelle Childs wrote:
>>
>>
>> <snip>The Internal Market Commissioner intends to bring forward a
>> proposal to extend the term of protection for sound recordings to 95
>> years. This proposal should be ready for adoption by the Commission
>> before the summer break of 2008.
>>
>>
>> http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=3DIP/08/240&form=
at=3DHTML&aged=3D0&language=3DEN&guiLanguage=3Den
>>
>>
>> IP/08/240
>>
>> Brussels, 14 February 2008
>> "Performing artists - no longer be the 'poor cousins' of the music
>> business" =96 Charlie McCreevy
>>
>> Commissioner Charlie McCreevy today announced his intention to
>> propose
>> to the College that the term of copyright protection for European
>> performers be increased from 50 to 95 years. Summarising the main
>> thrust of the proposal, Commissioner McCreevy stated: "I strongly
>> believe that copyright protection for Europe's performers
>> represents a
>> moral right to control the use of their work and earn a living from
>> their performances. I have not seen a convincing reason why a
>> composer
>> of music should benefit from a term of copyright which extends to the
>> composer's life and 70 years beyond, while the performer should only
>> enjoy 50 years, often not even covering his lifetime It is the
>> performer who gives life to the composition and while most of us have
>> no idea who wrote our favourite song =96 we can usually name the
>> performer."
>>
>> The Internal Market Commissioner intends to bring forward a proposal
>> to extend the term of protection for sound recordings to 95 years.
>> This proposal should be ready for adoption by the Commission before
>> the summer break of 2008.
>>
>> If nothing is done, thousands of European performers who recorded in
>> the late fifties and sixties will lose all of their airplay royalties
>> over the next ten years. "I am not talking about featured artists
>> like
>> Cliff Richard or Charles Aznavour. I am talking about the thousands
>> of
>> anonymous session musicians who contributed to sound recordings in
>> the
>> late fifties and sixties. They will no longer get airplay royalties
>> from their recordings. But these royalties are often their sole
>> pension", says Commissioner Charlie Mc Creevy in describing the
>> rationale behind his proposal.
>>
>> "I am determined to ensure that this extension will benefit all
>> artists =96 whether featured artists or session musicians," the
>> Commissioner says. "For session musicians, the record companies will
>> set up a fund =96 a substantial fund reserving at least 20% of the
>> income during the extended term to them. For featured artists,
>> original advances may no longer be set off against royalties in the
>> extended term. That means the artist would get all the royalties
>> during the extended term." he adds.
>>
>> The Commissioner also proposes a 'use it or lose it' provision. That
>> means that, in case a record company is unwilling to re-release a
>> performance during the extended term, the performer can move to
>> another label.
>>
>> Filling the pension gap
>>
>> A Commission survey shows that many European performers or singers
>> start their career in their early 20's. Session musicians, who are
>> not
>> a member of a band, often start performing when they are 17. That
>> means that when the current 50 year protection ends, they will be in
>> their 70's and given life expectancy in the EU - 75 years for men and
>> 81 years for women - it is not unusual for performers to live well
>> into their 80's and 90's.
>>
>> But once copyright protection for sound recordings has ended,
>> performers no longer receive any income from their sound recordings.
>> For session musicians and lesser known artists that means that income
>> stops when performers are at the most vulnerable period of their
>> lives
>> (retirement). They will also not get any payment when their
>> performances are sold on the Internet.
>>
>> No negative impact on consumer prices
>>
>> The Commissioner stressed that the proposal should not have a
>> negative
>> impact on consumer prices. "Empirical studies on the price effects of
>> copyright protection show that the price of sound recordings that are
>> out of copyright is not necessarily lower than that of sound
>> recordings in copyright.
>>
>> No negative impact on Europe's external trade balance
>>
>> The Commission has also looked at the trade implications of a longer
>> term of protection and provisionally concludes that most of the
>> additional revenue collected in an extended term would stay in Europe
>> and benefit European performers. This is good for promoting Europe's
>> performers and the cultural vibrancy of European sound recordings.
>>
>> Michelle Childs
>> Head of European Affairs
>> Knowledge Ecology International
>> michelle.childs@cptech.org
>>
>> "The world we have made, as a result of the level of thinking we have
>> done thus far, creates problems we cannot solve at the same level of
>> thinking at which we created them=94 Albert Einstein
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> A2k mailing list
>> A2k@lists.essential.org
>> http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/a2k
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> A2k mailing list
> A2k@lists.essential.org
> http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/a2k
>