[A2k] Re: [Patents] Re: [Upd-discuss] SCOTUS Overrules Rigid US AppealsCourt Approach to Patentability of Combinations of Existing Elements

[simo]

On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 13:01 -0400, Gregory Aharonian wrote:

> If you want to win this debate of science and engineering, don't rely on
> judges who don't understand the science and engineering.  Eventually the
> law catches up with the mistakes.  This statement about magentic tape
> fields on a hard drive is a horrible mistake.

However technically horrible, the meaning of what they are saying is the
same and holds even if you correct the statement to be sound for
engineers.

You have to produce better evidence and show how the meaning of the
sentence is wrong if you correct the statement to be technically
correct.

But I don't think you can do that, so you resort into looking at
marginal meaningless mistakes to try to get a point.

This tactic may work with people that are technically impaired, but
won't work here Greg.

Simo.