[A2k] web: HOW MOVIE, MUSIC, AND CONTENT PRODUCERS CAN PROTECT
COPYRIGHTS AND CAPTURE MORE REVENUE IN THE INTERNET AGE
Seth Johnson
seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org
Tue Jan 9 10:28:34 2007
My comment:
Do not try to bend the spoon; that's impossible. Instead, only
try to realize the truth.
What truth?
There is no spoon.
There is no spoon?
Then you will see that it is not the spoon that bends, it is
only yourself.
:-)
The author treats copyright as if it were about entertainment,
rather than publishing.
"Modification" of the first sale doctrine is just an oblique way
of saying establish xcaster's rights.
Seth
Sylvia Caras wrote:
>
> FindLaw columnist, attorney, and author Julie Hilden discusses some of
> the questions that have arisen as online or Internet-coordinated
> distribution has become possible in the "content industries" --
> movies, music, and (to some extent) books. Hilden argues that the
> traditional first-sale doctrine, which holds that only the first
> purchaser in the chain pays the creator for content, needs to be
> revised in the age of the Internet. She also considers ways in which
> companies can better deter copyright infringement -- through business
> choices and modification of the first-sale doctrine, not by suing
> potential customers.
>
> http://writ.lp.findlaw.com/hilden/20070108.html
> _______________________________________________
> A2k mailing list
> A2k@lists.essential.org
> http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/a2k
--
RIAA is the RISK! Our NET is P2P!
http://www.nyfairuse.org/action/ftc
DRM is Theft! We are the Stakeholders!
New Yorkers for Fair Use
http://www.nyfairuse.org
[CC] Counter-copyright: http://realmeasures.dyndns.org/cc
I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or
distribution of this incidentally recorded communication.
Original authorship should be attributed reasonably, but only so
far as such an expectation might hold for usual practice in
ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of
exclusive rights.