[A2k] US intervention on broadcasting treaty at WIPO General Assembly

[Thiru Balasubramaniam]

United States:

The 15th SCCR set the stage for the General Assembly to schedule or
consider the scheduling of a DipCon.

We believe that the scheduling a Diplomatic Conference is neither timely
or appropriate.  The text of the basic proposal is not stable,

There is no consensus and wide differences on a range of basic items
such as scope, exceptions and limitations, and TPMs

If you look at the consolidated text two years ago, 89 pages and 28
alternative. The current text, called the basic proposal, is 108 pages
long with 47 alternatives.

We are concerned that diplomatic conference to consider this document at
this time would not be successful because there is so much to be
resolved.  In fact, many countries left the last SCCR feeling
uncomfortable about the convening of a conference.

In our view the treaty on protection of broadcasting organizations
should be the subject of more work.

We stress that in these further nec expert meetings we would *NOT* seek
to broaden the scope to netcastsing or any of the new services as
discussed in the standing committee. We would leave these on a separate
track.

Unfortunately, the SCCR took premature action which we did not and
cannot support.

Further expert meetings would have Member States come to a better
understanding that would provide a dip con with a much greater chance of
success than we have now.