[A2k] Internet Governance Forum ends on high note

[Michelle Childs]

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11/02/igf_meeting_ends/
United Nations lauds internet's 'arranged marriage'
Internet Governance Forum ends on high note
By Kieren McCarthy in Athens
 Published Thursday 2nd November 2006 15:48

The closing day of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) has ended on a high
note with attendees from across the world (from business, government,
international organisations and civil society) all expressing their
delight at the experimental forum.

When the forum opened its doors in Athens four days ago it was uncertain
whether the meeting would work, or would even continue next year, despite
its five-year remit. But following a series of changes introduced to its
structure while the meeting itself was going on, the final session saw two
countries vying to host the event in 2010 - Azerbaijan and Lithunia - and
the host for next year, Brazil, announcing the date and location for the
meeting.

 "We are here, we are ready, and we are ready to participate," said a
joyous representative from the Women's Centre, who also announced a
"dynamic coalition" of a number of organisations for discussing online
gender issues. Jamie Love, director of the Consumer Project on
Technology, explained that he was searching for words to explain "just
that I feel good about this meeting". He settled for: "This is the right
thing to do at the right time for the internet."

IGF head honcho Nitin Desai made a joke this time last year when he was
asked about the forum's likely success: "Every United Nations meeting is
either a success or a great success." We asked him which it was after the
end of the closing session. "It was an outstanding success," he smiled.

Warning
That feeling was reiterated by ICANN chief exec Paul Twomey who presented
himself as the head of the only other organisation that has tried to build
a multi-stakeholder organisation surrounding the internet.

But Twomey also had some advice and a warning. Such organisations "are not
easy to put together and to manage at all", he warned. "I'll be a little
heretical here. I will particularly challenge business and civil society
in the dialogues that many people are talking about as they go between
here and Rio. The test I'll put to you is: are you sure that the
governments are engaged in the dialogue?"

A number of governments had stood up during the course of the session and
all were complimentary, but many also had suggestions for changes. Former
Mali minister and the head of the first part of the WSIS process Adama
Samassekou said. "I was just wondering as to the actual format of the
forum in terms of overall results. After the wonderful discussions we've
had, why shouldn't we have something specific come out of it?"

Decision making thorn
This issue of whether the IGF should be decision-making body is a thorny
topic. Desai resisted efforts to move the forum to a more legislative
basis. "Decision-making means having a legislative capacity and it means
you have to have a defined membership. The IGF is an open door. This is a
controversial issue but the IGF is not a membership-based model."

The same view was reiterated by the IGF Secretariat head Markus Kummer,
who stressed that he wanted to keep the forum's "open doors policy" when
asked if he would consider accrediting particular organisations.

Desai warned there was still much to do, however, referring to the three
widely different cultures of the governments, non-governmental
organisations, and civil society that had sat down in Athens. The first
has its protocols, the second has strong views, and the third wants things
done now, he explained.

"I think in all three cultures we need a little adjustment. I think
governments will have to accept that in a multi-stakeholder forum will be
a little more frank than a normal democratic conference would be and that
they have to participate in it in that spirit. Equally, I believe civil
society has to accept that if the purpose of this exercise is ultimately
to lead to joint action, then a certain degree of restraint - they have to
approach this in a different way. If you want to work with somebody, you
are not going to be able to work with somebody if you start calling that
somebody names straight away."

Arranged marriage
And then, in a characteristic flourish, Desai provided an analogy for the
IGF and the way forward. "In my country, when people get married, we have
arranged marriages, and usually the first meeting between the boy and the
girl, they are scoping each other out, so the conversation tends to cover
everything. And at the second and the third meeting they start talking
about more specific things, what are your tastes in this area or that
area? And it is some time before they actually start holding hands. So
let's just treat this as a first meeting where people have just gotten to
know one another and maybe it will lead to marriage."

Desai was confident the IGF will have the full five-year run originally
planned, and Kummer was also optimistic about getting more funding for
next year - "now the first meeting is over, we have a great product to
sell potential donors".

The next IGF meeting will be held on 12-14 November 2007 in Rio de Janeiro.=
 =AE



--
Michelle Childs -Head of European Affairs
Consumer Project on Technology in London
24, Highbury Crescent, London, N5 1RX,UK.
Tel:+44(0)207 226 6663 ex 252.
Mob:+44(0)790 386 4642. Fax: +44(0)207 354 0607
http://www.cptech.org

Consumer Project on Technology in Washington, DC
1621 Connecticut Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20009 USA .Tel.:
+1.202.332.2670,Fax: +1.202.332.2673

Consumer Project on Technology in Geneva
1 Route des  Morillons, CP 2100, 1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland
Tel: +41 22 791 6727