[A2k] Re: A2k digest, Vol 1 #375 - 12 msgs
Seth Johnson
seth.johnson@RealMeasures.dyndns.org
Mon Apr 10 11:42:01 2006
Taran Rampersad wrote:
>
> Seth Johnson wrote:
> > Taran Rampersad wrote:
> >
> >> Well, Seth, where we differ is that you seem to be fixated on the name=
,
> >> and you've been very good about saying that 'Free Software' doesn't
> >> confuse some people as well.
> >
> > Never said any such thing.
> Check through your sent mail. It's there, where you said that there was
> only one way to interpret the phrase 'Free Software'.
Huh? I never said "free software" doesn't confuse some people.
You're referring to the following:
> > At the end of the day, we use 'free' for Free
> > Software even though the word has been and continues to be abused by
> > marketers ('free of what? Lice?'). but we're willing to toss a phrase o=
n
> > the bonfire because it's ambiguous. Meanwhile, 'Open Source' has become
> > about as ambiguous.
> "Free software" has only had one ambiguity, under the English
> vernacular, for the unacquainted. "Open Source" started out
> ambiguous in innumerable ways, and is not necessarily any more
> ambiguous now than it was from the beginning.
Seth
>
> --
> Taran Rampersad
> Presently in: San Fernando, Trinidad and Tobago
> cnd@knowprose.com
>
> Looking for contracts/work!
> http://www.knowprose.com/node/9786
>
> New!: http://www.OpenDepth.com
> http://www.knowprose.com
> http://www.digitaldivide.net/profile/Taran
>
> Pictures: http://www.flickr.com/photos/knowprose/
>
> "Criticize by creating." =97 Michelangelo
>
> _______________________________________________
> A2k mailing list
> A2k@lists.essential.org
> http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/a2k
--
RIAA is the RISK! Our NET is P2P!
http://www.nyfairuse.org/action/ftc
DRM is Theft! We are the Stakeholders!
New Yorkers for Fair Use
http://www.nyfairuse.org
[CC] Counter-copyright: http://realmeasures.dyndns.org/cc
I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or
distribution of this incidentally recorded communication.
Original authorship should be attributed reasonably, but only so
far as such an expectation might hold for usual practice in
ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of
exclusive rights.