[A2k] FSFE Statement at PCIPD

[Georg C. F. Greve]

--
Hi all,

our statement (included below) at the PCIPD is now (permantenly)
available at

 http://fsfeurope.org/projects/wipo/statement-20040415.en.html

Regards,
Georg



                            STATEMENT BY
               FREE SOFTWARE FOUNDATION EUROPE (FSFE)
                               AT THE
                 PERMANENT COMMITTEE ON COOPERATION
                     FOR DEVELOPMENT RELATED TO
                        INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
                               (PCIPD)

                     (Geneva, 14-15 April 2005)

Mr. Chairman,

on behalf of the Free Software Foundation Europe I congratulate you
and your co-chair on the trust placed in you for this fourth PCIPD
session. Our organisation is a globally active centre of expertise
for Free Software with a European focus, and our intervention will
deal with the digital development activities referred to in document
number PCIPD/4/2 prepared by the bureau.

Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) are described in
the document both as tools for administration systems and as the
object of technology transfer. Furthermore ICTs impact upon other
areas of interest to WIPO, in particular copyright, and Free Software
can contribute positively to all of these.

Free Software is defined by the freedom of unlimited use for any
purpose, the freedom to study, the freedom to modify and the freedom
to distribute. In this context we would like to refer to the
Declaration of Principles and the Plan of Action adopted by all UN
Member States during the December 2003 World Summit on the
Information Society.

As -- amongst others -- paragraph 23 o) of the Plan of Action states,
a variety of software models such as proprietary and Free Software
should be promoted. This impacts on paragraph 12 and 34 of PCIPD/4/2,
but also paragraphs 48 and 49 need to be seen in the light of this
decision by the Member States.

It is crucial that WIPO programmes do not de-jure or de-facto mandate
any of these activities in favour of proprietary software. All such
activities should be equally and fully available with Free Software.

Mr. Chairman,

regarding technology transfer and the bridging of the digital divide,
the potential of Free Software should be taken into account by the
measures listed in section II of the document.

As alluded to by the ``knowledge economy'' reference in paragraph 14,
Information and Communication Technologies can be a powerful tool to
enable industrial growth. The sustainability of such growth is to a
very high degree a function of the control over such ICT
infrastructures.

The model of proprietary software is based on absolute and permanent
control by the proprietor. On the other hand,the model of Free
Software, based on the creative use of copyright, offers freedom for
political and commercial activity, giving each Member State
flexibility and control over their ICT infrastructure.

The region of Extremadura in Spain is a good example how a primarily
agricultural economy can rapidly evolve into a digitally networked
high-skill region fostering high economic development through
commercial Free Software clusters.

Adding training and competency in Free Software to WIPO's development
related programmes will greatly increase their impact and open up an
entire new area of knowledge based economic development.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Statement by Mr. Georg C.F. Greve <greve@fsfeurope.org>
 Free Software Foundation Europe, President

--
Georg C. F. Greve                                 <greve@fsfeurope.org>
Free Software Foundation Europe	                 (http://fsfeurope.org)
Join the Fellowship and protect your freedom!     (http://www.fsfe.org)
--
[ Content of type application/pgp-signature deleted ]