[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: subsequent use: medical or govt.-held info. different?

To: med-privacy@essential.org
Subject: Re: subsequent use: medical or govt.-held info. different?
From: Dynalysis of Princeton <mail@dynalysis.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 1999 09:55:21 +0000
Organization: Dynalysis of Princeton
References: <v03007811b2e1284b54cf@[207.226.3.6]>

saw your note.  Will individuals' specific names be held confidential?  What is
your objective?

Barb

Deirdre Mulligan wrote:

> Reporter looking for individuals to discuss specific first-person
> violations of medical record privacy. Please email asap (at latest 2/15/99)
> to t10033@aol.com
>
> Deirdre Mulligan
> Staff Counsel
> Center for Democracy and Technology
> 1634 Eye Street, NW
> 11th Floor
> Washington, DC 20006
> (v) +1.202.637.9800
> (f) +1.202.637.0968
> http://www.cdt.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: subsequent use: medical or govt.-held info. different?
  - From: Deirdre Mulligan <deirdre@cdt.org>

References:
- Re: subsequent use: medical or govt.-held info. different?
  - From: Deirdre Mulligan <deirdre@cdt.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Need For Site?
Next by Date: Re: Need For Site?
Prev by thread: Re: subsequent use: medical or govt.-held info. different?
Next by thread: Re: subsequent use: medical or govt.-held info. different?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread