[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Dave, you have posted several messages about network congestion which
report the local exchange carrier's line that computer users are imposing
large costs on the network. There is much reason to be skeptical of
such claims. One reason is that ISPs have very few lines per customer --
most ISP's have 10 to 20 residential customers per incoming line.
Thus, it is unlikely that dial-in ISP users are exceeding the normal
demands for network build-out. This is a portion of our testimony
on this topic in the Maryland PSC proceeding. jamie
BEFORE THE MARYLAND PUBLIC SERVICES COMMISSION
In the Matter of the Residential )
Intellilinq BRI Service Offering ) Case 8730
of Bell Atlantic, Maryland, Inc. )
October 15, 1996
PREPARED TESTIMONY OF JAMES PACKARD LOVE
on behalf of
CONSUMER PROJECT ON TECHNOLOGY
Q13. What about network congestion?
A13. There is no evidence that ISDN is causing any
network congestion. Nor is there much evidence that
personal computers are causing network congestion.
While it may be the case that lines for Internet
Service Providers (ISPs) are used heavily at certain
times of the day, it does not follow that
residential users are causing problems.
Telephone networks are fixed cost plants.
The cost of the network is determined by the build-out
at any given time, regardless of usage. The only
"usage" cost is based upon the "build-out" for peak
usage. The residential network is built according to
certain assumptions regarding usage. The important
issue is the proper "capacity" for the system.
People who use the Internet as dial-in users don't
dial in all at once. They just don't. People have
complicated lives. They eat, sleep, go to school,
go to the movies, play with their children, and do
other things which don't involve the Internet.
What do we know about Internet usage? We know
that ISPs do not have one line per customer. They
have far less than one line. According to responses
from ISPs, most firms have between 10 and 20
customers per incoming line. That means simply that
only 5 to 10 percent of their customers can be using
the service at any given time. If ISPs only have
one line for every 10 to 20 customers, then BA has
to show that the residential network is build for
less than 5 to 10 percent of the customers to be
connected at one time. If they can't show that,
then they do not have a case for charging for usage.
Q14. What about congestion at the ISPs?
A14. ISPs, like other businesses, may use lines
intensely. That isn't necessarily bad for BA,
because BA is selling telecommunications services to
the people who make the incoming calls. For
example, BA is promoting the sale of second
telephone lines. These POTS lines do not generate
much in long distance revenue. They are used mostly
for teenagers, modems and faxes. When BA sells an
apparently profitable POTS line so a consumer can
call an ISP, BA is making money on the sale of the
residential POTS line. If the residential consumer
could not call an ISP, many consumers wouldn't need
the second POTS line. The ISP is generating a
demand for something that BA sells--residential
Q15. Should ISP's pay higher fees?
A15. BA has a practical monopoly in the residential
market, and they are also an active ISP. You can't
allow BA to discriminate against their rivals in the
ISP business. Lots of businesses make intensive use
of their lines. Our organization has a PBX, and it
is often congested during the day. ISP's should pay
the same rates as other businesses pay for their
DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JAMES LOVE
James Love / email@example.com / P.O. Box 19367, Washington, DC 20036
Voice: 202/387-8030; Fax 202/234-5176
Center for Study of Responsive Law
Consumer Project on Technology; http://www.essential.org/cpt
Taxpayer Assets Project; http://www.tap.org