Re: Are ISDN calls on hold cheaper than active calls?

[Robert Wade Brown <rwb@robert.com>]

  2/5/96 6:06pm ct
  
  Robert Berger,
  
          Why can't they do all this under the current D channel protocal?
  
  Best,
  Robert Brown
  ==========================================
  
  At 13:46 2/5/96 -0500, Robert Berger wrote:
  >I believe the "correct" way to handle this is to have ISDN CPE to support TCP/
  >IP over the D channel and make the D channel part of the MP protocol so that
  >the CPE will bring up the B channels when data flow over the D channel execeeds
  >a threshold. The threshold could be protocol specific (like email will not
  >bring up the B channel, but flow through slowly, but an FTP or http data
  >would).
  >
  >This way remote sites would look like they were permanently connected.
  >
  >--
  >             Robert J. Berger - CTO / VP of Engineering
  >InterNex Information Services, Inc. 2302 Walsh Rd. Santa Clara, CA 95051
  >               Voice: 408-327-2290 Fax: 408-496-5484
  >  The future's already arrived - it's just not evenly distributed yet.
  >                         -- William Gibson --
  >
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                         "Save your money"..... Jack Paar
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  Robert Wade Brown... Independent Telecommunications Consultant
  Post Office Box 49049   Austin, TX 78765-9049   rwb@robert.com
  Telephones: 512/349- Ofc: 7070 Fax: 7171  Res: 7272  Fax: 7373
  800/275-8787, Fax 800/349-7020