(fwd) Kenya: Farmers Quit Tobacco Treadmill (fwd)

[Robert Weissman <rob@essential.org>]

January 1999

TOBACCO CULTIVATION THREATENS FOOD SECURITY IN KENYA

Cigarette multinational corporations in Kenya are accused of endangering the
country's food security, by their tobacco cultivation.

By Jane Kariuki

 Migori, Kenya: When the British American Tobacco Company, one of the
world's leading cigarette multinationals, made its coveted entry into Kenya
in 1907, few could have predicted that it would be facing charges of
endangering the country's food security some 90 years later.

 But that is precisely the allegation BAT faces today along with others in
the tobacco industry.

 The largest agro-based company in Kenya today, BAT contracts 17,500
small-scale farmers to cultivate tobacco over an estimated 15,000 hectares
of fertile agricultural land. But some of them are switching to food crops,
complaining that growing tobacco requires intensive labour and close care
for long periods and that the earnings are low. They say they neither have
the time to grow traditional food crops - like maize, beans, sorghum,
cassava, and sweet potatoes - nor do they earn enough to buy sufficient food
for the family.

 'After all the work, I was still unable to make ends meet,' says George
Onyango, a farmer in Migori district in western Kenya. Onyango has recently
abandoned tobacco for maize on his 1.25-hectare land. He says his annual
income has mushroomed from about 8,000 shillings ($133) from a single
tobacco crop to a tidy 60,000 shillings ($1,000) from two harvests of maize
a year.

 Not only is his work less tedious now, says the father of four, 'but I can
feed my family and sell off some of the maize to pay school fees.'

 The tobacco farmer's year begins with the preparation of seedbeds around
February. BAT hands out the seeds free, but most farm inputs like chemicals
and fertilisers come as loans.

 Constant watering, weeding and ridging is followed by harvesting in July.
That's not the end of it - curing takes time, not least because wood is
becoming rarer in tobacco-growing areas, forcing farmers to walk longer
distances each time around. Farmers then have to inspect the tobacco leaf by
leaf before hauling it all off for weighing.

 As Awino, another Migori farmer, points out, 'In the tobacco season we have
a lot of work and we have little time to cook for our children. We buy our
maize from the town.'

 This explains why the tobacco cultivation season from February to August
sometimes sees Awino's two teenage sons skip school to help her with
housework. For her pains, Awino makes about 5,000 shillings ($83) after the
multinational has recovered its loan. She says she is now considering
switching to sugarcane, also a cash crop.

 It is not until July that most farmers can take a break from tobacco and
start cultivating food crops in time for the short November rains. But the
problem for Kenya is that just one season of maize does not produce enough
to feed its population of 30 million. The country needs two harvests in most
areas to produce the needed three million tonnes. As a result, Kenya was
forced to import maize from neighbouring countries in 1997.

 It is evident to a visitor to Migori that, despite the tobacco money, cases
of malnutrition in children are high and accommodation is basic. A survey by
the United Nations Children's Fund bears out the impression - it says 52% of
children in Migori district either suffer from chronic or acute
under-nutrition or are underweight.

 As pointed out in a 1994 study conducted by John Nkuchia for the University
of Michigan School of Public Health, tobacco has changed little materially
for farmers - it may have even lowered incomes.

 The paper, presented at the Ninth World Conference on Tobacco and Health in
Paris, suggests that food production in the tobacco-growing districts of
Kenya has decreased as farmers have shifted from food crops to tobacco.

 Using figures extracted from the Kenyan Central Bureau of Statistics and
'the industry's annual reports', Nkuchia estimated that the number of
farmers contracted by BAT increased by 67% from 7,000 in 1972 to 11,000 in
1991, and by 36% from 1991 to 1993. Alongside, the land under tobacco grew
rapidly.

 At this rate, he wrote in Milking the Last Drop: A Case of the Tobacco
Industry in Kenya, 'the number of farmers growing tobacco will nearly double
by 2010'. And that, he feared, would double the amount of land used for
tobacco cultivation at the expense of food crops.

 Whether BAT is to blame for the suggested bleak scenario is a matter of
opinion. The company strongly denies endangering food security. It also
denies advising farmers to keep aside one or two hectares of land for
tobacco as Nkuchia claims. 'Farmers grow their tobacco on any size of land
they want - we do not specify for them the size of land to be used on
tobacco,' said Keli Kiilu, a BAT spokesperson.

 But the comments of farmers such as Onyango and Awino appear to support
Nkuchia's argument that net income from tobacco is less than from food
crops.

 There is, however, one important distinction: Nkuchia's evidence was
gathered from Meru district in eastern Kenya. He said that a visit to Migori
district failed to provide any evidence that farmers there were switching
from tobacco to food cultivation. But the interviews by Panos Features show
some Migori farmers may now be following the Meru example.

 Kenyan government literature discussing the problem of under-nutrition in
Migori district admits that people in the district have '...insufficient
powers to purchase the right foods'.

 BAT on the other hand argues that tobacco farmers have fared well under it.
It says BAT farmers earned 672 million shillings ($11.2 million) in 1997, wh
ile the previous year's earnings topped 819 million shillings ($13.6
million).

 Kiilu also points out that increased tobacco production has generated
ancillary employment in distribution, marketing and retailing. BAT
cigarettes are sold through 49 distributors, 1,000 stockists or wholesalers
and at least 40,000 retailers. All told, more than a million Kenyans derive
their livelihood from BAT. And the company prides itself in supporting the
government through taxes and rural development programmes such as
tree-planting.

 Indeed, there are many farmers who like working for BAT and even cultivate
tobacco out of season, which is prohibited by law.

But the case of Onyango suggests that the profits made by BAT are not
trickling down to the small farmer. This is an irony because small farmers
are the backbone of agriculture, which makes up the largest portion of
Kenya's economy, accounting for some 29% of its Gross Domestic Product.

 As with many developing countries around the world, Kenya is increasingly
shifting toward export-driven cash crops such as tea, coffee and tobacco to
offset an external debt which by 1985 had reached $7.4 billion. Tobacco is
Kenya's major foreign exchange earner - in 1997 BAT alone earned a record
906 million shillings ($15.4 million) in foreign exchange.

 Tobacco, however, is not the only cash crop causing problems to small
farmers. In sugarcane-growing areas like Bungoma district in western Kenya,
there are similar reports of farmers who earn as little as 10,000 shillings
($166) per acre of land, toiling with their families all year round on a
crop that too leaves them with little time to grow food. - Third World
Network Features/PANOS

-ends-

About the writer: Jane Kariuki is a contributor to Panos Features, in which
the above article first appeared (20 December 1998).

When reproducing this feature, please credit Third World Network Features
and (if applicable) the cooperating magazine or agency involved in the
article, and give the byline. Please send us cuttings.

Third World Network is also accessible on the World Wide Web. Please visit
our web site at http://www.twnside.org.sg