[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Microsoft -- remedies and IBM's 1984 EC undertaking
- To: ABA Antitrust List <AT-MEMBERS@ABANET.ORG>
- Subject: Microsoft -- remedies and IBM's 1984 EC undertaking
- From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 18:28:41 -0500
- Organization: http://www.cptech.org
--------------------------------------------------------
Info-Policy-Notes | Available from listproc@cptech.org
--------------------------------------------------------
INFORMATION POLICY NOTES
December 18, 1997
Remedies for Microsoft anticompetitive practices --
One model is the EC's 1984 IBM Undertaking
I was in Brussels last week, where I met with a number of EC officials
about the Microsoft case. In one meeting we spent some time looking at
the IBM's 1984 EC undertaking, which I believe is cited as Bull. EC
10-1984, pages 96-103. The 1984 IBM undertaking was quite relevant to
the broader issues of conduct rules for Microsoft, with respect to
interoperability with the OS (or important MS applications, like MSIE).
When (and if) the EC gets involved in these issues, it will be model
that one looks at. It sets out specific rules by which IBM agrees to
share information and provide assistance to its competitors, who market
software and hardware which interoperates with the IBM products. IBM not
only signed the agreement, they reportedly carried it out in good
faith. It is striking how much of the 1984 IBM agreement speaks to the
same problems now presented by Microsoft's manipulation of Windows.
Many readers will see a model that could very easily be modified for
Microsoft. (I have a paper copy of the undertaking, but would
appreciate pointers to a copy in digital form, on the Web or from
Lexis.)
James Love (love@cptech.org, 202.387.8030, http://www.cptech.org)
Here are a few sections from the undertaking, which give a sense of
the agreement:
Section 6
If IBM makes a change to an existing interface (hardware interface
or program external of an existing release) in such a way that it would
make System/370 products attaching to such existing interface
inoperable, IBM will disclose the change to any competing undertaking at
announcement which shall be sufficiently in advance of general
availability to permit such undertakings to make the necessary
adjustments in products so attached. Also, if IBM makes a change to the
additional information supplied in lieu of program externals for the
purpose of attachment, and the change causes an attached product to
become inoperable, then IBM will, on request, either supply the changed
information or provide sufficient assistance to make the attached
product operate.
Section 14
IBM recognizes the widespread interest in interconnecting systems and
networks of different manufacturers. IBM favours such interconnecting
systems and networks of different manufacturers. IBM favours such
interconnections and has published and will publish extensive
information about it including formats and protocols which facilitate
attachment by competitors of their systems or networks to IBM SNA
networks. IBM understands that to the extent that SNA is different from
OSI, competitors depend upon IBM information to be able to interconnect
their products with IBM SNA products. IBM has an interest in issuing
information on SNA formats and protocols as soon as possible and it
confirms that it will take all reasonable steps to expedite the
availability of the relevant documentation.
Accordingly:
(a) On announcement of a System/370 product that implements
enhancements to SNA on System/370, IBM will identify the functions in
such products that implement such enhancements. At announcement, IBM
will, upon request from interested persons, identify use of existing
formats and protocols. Where that product uses enhanced SNA formats and
protocols, then subject to paragraph 7, IBM will as soon after
announcement as the relevant SNA formats and protocols are reasonably
stable and the architecture has been formulated and described or at
general availability whichever is the earlier, publish the SNA formats
and protocols that implement such enhancements, together with
appropriate product documentation, in order to enable attachment of
other systems (which may be comprised of multiple products) and networks
to the IBM SNA network.
[snip]
(b) IBM has actively participated in international standards efforts in
support of open system interconnection (OSI) and will continue its
active support of OSI as the standard for interconnecting systems,
products and networks of different manufacturers.
--------------------------
The agreement has 19 other sections, plus definitions and two
Appendices.
The suggestions by Microsoft that the current DOJ dispute over OEM
licenses and bundling the MSIE represents some type of radical meddling
by the government seems odd, given the far reaching undertaking that IBM
signed in this earlier case, without much damage to IBM's ability to do
business.
Jamie
------------------------------------------------------------
INFORMATION POLICY NOTES is a newsletter sponsored by the Consumer
Project on Technology (CPT), a project of Ralph Nader's Center for
Study of Responsive Law. The LISTPROC services are provide by Essential
Information. Archives of Info-Policy-Notes are available
from http://www.essential.org/listproc/info-policy-notes/ (no period).
CPT's Web page is http://www.cptech.org (no period). CPT can both be
reached off the net at P.O. Box 19367, Washington, DC 20036, Voice:
202/387-8030; Fax: 202/234-5176. Subscription requests to
listproc@cptech.org with the message:
subscribe info-policy-notes Jane Doe