[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
No Subject
CONGRESSMAN MARKEY INTRODUCES RESTRUCTURING LEGISLATION
BILL WOULD PERMIT EXEMPTIONS FROM PURPA IF UTILITIES ALLOW RETAIL
COMPETITION OR DIVEST FROM ALL GENERATION ASSETS
Representative Ed Markey (D-MA) introduced legislation at the end of
January that lays out conditions for exempting utilities from the
mandatory purchase provisions in section 210 of the Public
Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA). Section 210
requires electric utilities to sign power purchase agreements
with independent generators using renewable fuels or cogeneration
at the utilities' marginal cost for new capacity.
The "Electric Power Competition Act of 1996" (H.R. 2929) would
allow state regulatory commissions to issue a "certificate of
competition" to utilities that either allow retail competition in
their service territory or divest all generation assets.
Furthermore, protections for renewable energy, energy efficiency
and low-income programs would have to be addressed structurally
with a nonbypassable charge on the distribution system. States
could also adopt a minimum portfolio standard to meet the
renewables and fuel diversity requirements.
Representative Markey is a member of the House Commerce Committee
and serves on the Energy and Power Subcommittee that considers
legislation pertaining to electricity regulation.
Full copies of the bill and Congressman Markey's floor statement are
available via email only and can be obtained by sending a request to
cmep@citizen.org. A summary of the legislation follows:
The "Electric Power Competition Act of 1996" begins with a
finding that:
-- competition will benefit consumers and is preferable to
regulation of monopolies.
-- open access to transmission and distribution facilities
on a non-discriminatory basis is essential.
-- programs to promote fuel diversity, renewables,
efficiency and environmental protection are necessary
-- utilities must be able to recover "legitimate and
verifiable stranded costs"
-- section 210 of PURPA should be maintained until clearly
defined standards for competition are met
-- elimination of some anti-trust exemptions for utilities
will prevent market power abuses.
The bill amends PURPA to include the following:
-- An electric utility can be exempted from the mandatory
purchase provisions of section 210 upon receiving a
"certification of competition" from a state regulatory
authority.
-- existing power purchase agreements under section 210
cannot be altered or renegotiated regardless of whether or
nor a utility qualifies for a certification of competition.
-- states may not be prevented from "favoring or disfavoring
particular types of generation" in its implementation of
section 210. In particular, states are permitted to use
segmented competitive bidding to determine the appropriate
avoided cost for a specific generation technology. This
section would essentially overturn the FERC decision on
California's Biennial Resource Planning Update (BRPU) and
allow states to use California's methodology for
implementing PURPA to help individual renewable generating
technologies.
States can issue a certification of competition to a utility if
it meets either a "Federal retail competition standard" or a
"Federal divestiture standard".
-- a utility is able to meet the "Federal retail competition
standard" if: there is competition in serving retail
customers within its territory, any entity may build or
operate new generating capacity, and the utility cannot
exert market power to gain advantage over other buyers and
sellers in its service territory. Certification can be
withdrawn if these conditions are violated.
-- a utility can meet the "Federal divestiture standard" if
it has divested itself of all generation assets and is
prohibited from owning or controlling any generation so long
as it has monopoly control over transmission and
distribution. In addition, the utility must adopt non-
discriminatory open access tariffs.
A certificate of competition cannot be issued unless the
following conditions exist:
-- all suppliers of electricity to the utility or customers
have "both the incentive and opportunity to provide energy
efficiency and renewable energy resources that are less
costly on a life-cycle basis than displaced generation."
Furthermore, nonbypassable distribution charges must be
adopted to support low-income services, fuel diversity
requirements and energy efficiency programs. The fuel
diversity requirement may also be met "through minimum
portfolio standards that ensure maintenance or improvement
of current levels of reliance on renewable energy
resources."
-- a determination is made that structural mechanisms are in
place to protect consumers from "price discrimination or
undue price increases" and that no customer class can avoid
its share of stranded cost recovery.
-- there is a determination that recovery of stranded costs
is "not contingent on continued operation of the generation
assets for which recovery is approved."
Finally, the bill alters antitrust law so that utilities may not use the
"State action" doctrine as a "defense against charges of anticompetitive
behavior in unregulated generation markets."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
To receive regular information on electricity restructuring issues from
Public Citizen's Critical Mass Energy Project, send the following message
to listproc@essential.org: SUBSCRIBE ELEC-LIST [your name - organizational
affiliation - home state]
The Critical Mass home page is located at http://www.essential.org/CMEP
-----------------------------------------------------------------------