[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE:
Jackie,
First,
"high-temperature" waste incineration isn't. The temperature of the burning
waste is variable through the pile. In addition, dioxin is formed also in the
*stack* from recombination of chlorine and organics. If you look at ANY stack
emission document from any incinerator in the US (which they are required to
provide every 9 months by EPA regulations) you will find out how much dioxin it
emits during the *best* of burning conditions (that is, they make very sure that
everything is in top working condition - temp, scrubbers, etc - when the tests
are done). I don't have the new EPA regs in front of me, but they specify the
amount of total dioxins that are allowed. Most incinerators even with
retrofits find it difficult to keep within these limits (they are referred to as
Best Available Technology requirements).
Finally, as Paul Connett
constantly reminds us, there is the ash. The ash is heavily contaminated with
dioxins, especially the fly ash (onto which dioxin has reformed and clung) that
is removed by the filters, scrubbers, and/or electrostatic precipitators. The
ash needs landfills and should be classified as toxic waste. It has all the
characteristics of toxic waste but was "exempted" by the EPA finding and
specifying a test that would not expose its toxicity.
Jon
I
need specific info as to why high temperature waste incineration does not
eliminate the dioxin emissions. We have a legislative study committee being
told that waste incineration is OK if the temperature is high enough-then
dioxin is not a problem. They are generally ill-informed. Thanks for any help.
Jackie Elliott