[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A bit of history, for those new to the anti-dioxin movement
I understand the Europeans finger sulphur dioxide at quite low ambient
levels for asthma as well...
Delores Broten
At 11:58 AM 08/08/97 -0400, you wrote:
>At 01:55 AM 8/8/97 -0400 ,jon@cqs.com wrote:
>
>>Oh, yes, there's a bit of good news that I forgot to
>>report: after
>>a 6-year battle, a BFI-owned incinerator in Bronx, N.Y.
>>was closed
>>by order of the Governor of New York.
>
>That is good news....medical waste incineration in
>general is a high impact, high cost alternative for
>managing medical waste. The older genre of
>medical waste incinerators without any acid gas or
>decent particulate controls are especially nasty.
>
>One of the
>>fascinating
>>bits of scientific fallout from this struggle is a
>>possible linkage
>>between dioxin-laden particulates and the pandemic of
>>ASTHMA
>>in the U.S. (and possibly elsewhere, I haven't seen the
>>literature
>>from Europe).
>
>I doubt there is any connection at all between PCDD/F exposures
>and causation/aggravation of asthma. I've never seen a single
>article even suggesting this in the American Review of Respiratory Disease
>and Critical Care Medicine, which is the pre-eminent journal
>in the world on respiratory diseases, including asthma.
>
>
> The operation of this relatively small
>>medical
>>waste incinerator - which NEVER had a stack test -
>
>Any scientist who would conclusively determine that
>a community health effect came from a medical
>waste incinerator on which there was no information
>about emissions and therefore no way to
>calculate/predict actual exposures would likely be
>very quickly blown out of the water.
>
> was
>>followed
>>by a DOUBLING of asthma visits to hospitals and clinics
>>and asthma
>>deaths.
>
>Emissions of hydrochloric acid, fine particulate matter and
>possibly airborne chromium (a known risk factor for
>occupational asthma) are the more likely cause of any asthma morbidity
>that was found.
>
>Airborne particulate matter doesn't have to contain
>any chemical toxicants to exert a toxic effect,
>particularly on pre-existing asthmatics.
>
>Asthma is a disease of chronic and gross inflamation of the airways
>of the lung and the resulting sensitization of these tissues
>to further airborne insults. Acid aerosals and fine particulate matter have
>the potential to seriously aggravate such asthmatic conditions
>by triggering bronchospasm, or a narrowing of the airways
>of the lung, in persons whose airways are already inflamed
>because of exposure to allergens, chronic lung infections,
>exposure to aspirated gastric acids, other occupational/environmental
>exposures, genetic predisposition or from other factors.
>
>Older medical waste incinerators without effective particulate
>controls are common sources of heavy particulate emissions, particularly
>when poorly trained hospital personnel jam them full of
>waste creating poor combustion conditions.
>
>>The possibility that dioxin may be at work in the
>>asthma pandemic
>>is interesting as well because we know that diesel
>>particulates
>>have dioxin molecules clinging to them because
>>organochlorine
>>solvents are used in the oil refining process for
>>diesel fuel.
>
>As noted above, I am unaware of any support in the
>medical literature that PCDD/F in diesel particulate
>play any role whatsoever in asthmatic responses.
>
>If you have such medical literature abstracts,
>"post 'em if you got 'em"
>
>Diesel particulates contribute to asthmatic responses
>because they are very small and they can be coated
>with irritating substances that condense on such particles.
>
>Diesel particulate is a cancer hazard primarily because
>it contains polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which are
>also found in cigarette smoke and coke oven emissions.
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Alex J. Sagady & Associates Email: asagady@sojourn.com
>Environmental Consulting and Database Systems
>PO Box 39 East Lansing, MI 48826-0039
>(517) 332-6971 (voice); (517) 332-8987 (fax)
>
>
>
Delores Broten,
Reach for Unbleached! Foundation,
Box 39, Whaletown BC Canada V0P 1Z0
Ph/fax: (250) 935-6992
http://www.rfu.org
dbroten@rfu.org