Moving Gently on East Timor

[Robert Weissman <rob@essential.org>]

Moving Gently on East Timor
By Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman

The Clinton administration's shamefully slow response to the savagery
unleashed by the Indonesian military and militia on the people of East
Timor allowed a vicious slaughter to take place. East Timor's capital,
Dili, now lies in ruins, hundreds or quite likely thousands of Timorese
have been killed since they voted overwhelmingly for independence on
August 30, and tens or hundreds of thousands of Timorese are now hiding in
the mountains facing starvation and fearing possible attacks by Indonesian
armed forces.

Under pressure from grassroots activists, Congress and foreign governments
and aroused by the sheer savagery of the Indonesian attack on the
Timorese, the administration has now ratcheted up its rhetoric of
condemnation, announced meaningful cuts in military aid, and watched
approvingly as the International Monetary Fund and World Bank suspended
new loans. And as a result of international pressure, Indonesia has agreed
to allow a peacekeeping force into East Timor.

For all this slow progress, until the Australian-led peacekeeping
operation lands in East Timor, there remains the substantial possibility
of a new round of bloodletting. Even stronger pressure from the United
States, as well as other international powers, will be needed to assure
that calamity does not occur.

Leaving aside the ghastly history of U.S. military and diplomatic support
for the brutal and illegal Indonesian occupation of East Timor -- a
24-year occupation in which an estimated 200,000 Timorese were killed --
why has the U.S. response to the unfolding butchery in East Timor been so
laggardly?

The New York Times went a long way to answering this crucial question in a
September 9 front-page story titled, "With Other Goals in Indonesia, U.S.
Moves Gently on East Timor."

"We have myriad interests" in Indonesia, explained State Department
spokesperson Jaime Rubin in one of his daily briefings, "and what our job
is is to try to balance those various interests." 

Others in the government and chattering class, such as Eleanor Clift of
Newsweek, echoed this basic sentiment. The United States should be
"realistic" in setting its policy on East Timor, they urged, noting the
multiple U.S. "interests" in Indonesia and the importance of promoting
"stability."

Since the prescription was to balance these "interests" in "stability"
against the lives of the Timorese, it is worth identifying what they are. 

"We have a business interest," said Rubin in identifying competing U.S.
interests in Indonesia. That is, the U.S. government wants to protect U.S.
investments in Indonesia -- Nike's subcontractor factories, the mines of
Freeport McMoRan, the oil drilling of Texaco, Chevron and Mobil. Strong
diplomatic pressure on Indonesia might conceivably have led to the
revocation of concessions and privileges for U.S. corporations, worried
the practitioners of realpolitik. 

Worse, from this point of view, was the possibility that support for the
Timorese will somehow flare up Indonesian separatist movements in Aceh
(where Mobil is heavily invested) and Irian Jaya (where Freeport McMoRan
runs the world's largest gold mine).

A broader U.S. business interest was in maintaining the flow of IMF and
World Bank money to Indonesia, so the country maintains its commitment to
the "structural adjustment" policies which require it to remove
restrictions on foreign investment, further orient its economy to exports,
privatize government enterprises and cut subsidies to the poor. 

Additionally, given the precarious state of the Indonesian economy, and
the success of the IMF in deepening Indonesian dependence on foreign money
flows, a sudden cut off of IMF and Bank monies might in fact send a
harmful shock to the economy (whatever the long-run benefits of severing
ties with the international financial institutions). The announced cut off
of funds is actually a suspension of future monies not yet allocated, and
is only temporary, so the feared effect on the international markets has
been muted.

Of course, it would be misleading to say the U.S. government was slow to
act in Indonesia/East Timor only because it wanted to protect Nike and
other U.S. multinationals. In addition to the commercial and broader
economic stability issues, the U.S. foreign policy and military
establishments attach great geopolitical importance to maintaining good
ties with the Indonesian government and especially the Indonesian military
(viewed as a counterweight to China and a dependable regional ally).

Still, there is no doubt that the U.S. "business interest" played a
significant role in the decision to "move gently" on East Timor in the
early days of the post-election slaughter. Even the New York Times
acknowledged a U.S. government concern that a threatened IMF and aid cut
off "could also harm American corporations that have large investments in
Indonesia."

In time, we'll know how many Timorese died in the weeks following their
vote for independence, in part because of U.S. government concern about
"our business interest" in Indonesia.

Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime
Reporter. Robert Weissman is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based
Multinational Monitor. They are co-authors of Corporate Predators: The
Hunt for MegaProfits and the Attack on Democracy (Monroe, Maine: Common
Courage Press, 1999; http://www.corporatepredators.org)

(c) Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman

--------------------------------------------------------------

Focus on the Corporation is a weekly column written by Russell Mokhiber
and Robert Weissman. Please feel free to forward the column to friends or
repost the column on other lists. If you would like to post the column on
a web site or publish it in print format, we ask that you first contact us
(russell@essential.org or rob@essential.org).

Focus on the Corporation is distributed to individuals on the listserve
corp-focus@essential.org. To subscribe to corp-focus, send an e-mail
message to listproc@essential.org with the following all in one line:

subscribe corp-focus <your name> (no period).

Focus on the Corporation columns are posted at
<http://lists.essential.org/corp-focus>.

Postings on corp-focus are limited to the columns. If you would like to
comment on the columns, send a message to russell@essential.org or
rob@essential.org.